Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs

Over the past three decades, coalbed methane (CBM) has moved from a mining hazard and novel unconventional resource to an important fossil fuel that accounts for approximately 10% of the U.S. natural gas production and reserves. The expansion of this industry required development of different drilli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramaswamy, Sunil
Other Authors: Ayers, Walter B
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: Texas A&M University 2008
Subjects:
CBM
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/85835
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-85835
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-858352013-01-08T10:38:59ZSelection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirsRamaswamy, SunilBest MethodCBMOver the past three decades, coalbed methane (CBM) has moved from a mining hazard and novel unconventional resource to an important fossil fuel that accounts for approximately 10% of the U.S. natural gas production and reserves. The expansion of this industry required development of different drilling, completion and stimulation practices for CBM in specific North American basins, owing to the complex combinations of geologic settings and reservoir parameters encountered. These challenges led to many technology advances and to development of CBM drilling, completion and stimulation technology for specific geologic settings. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine which geologic parameters affect CBM drilling, completion and stimulation decisions, (2) identify to the engineering best practices for specific geologic settings, and (3) present these findings in decision charts or advisory systems that could be applied by industry professionals. To determine best drilling, completion and stimulation practices for CBM reservoirs, I reviewed literature and solicited opinions of industry experts through responses to a questionnaire. I identified thirteen geologic parameters (and their ranges of values) that are assessed when selecting CBM drilling, completion and stimulating applications. These are coal thickness, number of seams, areal extent, dip, depth, rank, gas content, formation pressure, permeability, water saturation, and compressive strength, as well as the vertical distribution of coal beds and distance from coal reservoirs to fracture barriers or aquifers. Next, I identified the optimum CBM drilling, completion and stimulating practices for specific combinations of these geologic parameters. The engineering best practices identified in this project may be applied to new or existing fields, to optimize gas reserves and project economics. I identified the best engineering practices for the different CBM basins in N.A and combined these results in the form of two decision charts that engineers may use to select best drilling and completion practices, as well as the optimal stimulation methods and fluids for specific geologic settings. The decision charts are presented in a Visual Basic Application software program to facilitate their use by engineers.Texas A&M UniversityAyers, Walter B2008-10-10T20:52:16Z2008-10-10T20:52:16Z2007-122008-10-10T20:52:16ZBookThesisElectronic Thesistextelectronicborn digitalhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/85835en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Best Method
CBM
spellingShingle Best Method
CBM
Ramaswamy, Sunil
Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
description Over the past three decades, coalbed methane (CBM) has moved from a mining hazard and novel unconventional resource to an important fossil fuel that accounts for approximately 10% of the U.S. natural gas production and reserves. The expansion of this industry required development of different drilling, completion and stimulation practices for CBM in specific North American basins, owing to the complex combinations of geologic settings and reservoir parameters encountered. These challenges led to many technology advances and to development of CBM drilling, completion and stimulation technology for specific geologic settings. The objectives of this study were to (1) determine which geologic parameters affect CBM drilling, completion and stimulation decisions, (2) identify to the engineering best practices for specific geologic settings, and (3) present these findings in decision charts or advisory systems that could be applied by industry professionals. To determine best drilling, completion and stimulation practices for CBM reservoirs, I reviewed literature and solicited opinions of industry experts through responses to a questionnaire. I identified thirteen geologic parameters (and their ranges of values) that are assessed when selecting CBM drilling, completion and stimulating applications. These are coal thickness, number of seams, areal extent, dip, depth, rank, gas content, formation pressure, permeability, water saturation, and compressive strength, as well as the vertical distribution of coal beds and distance from coal reservoirs to fracture barriers or aquifers. Next, I identified the optimum CBM drilling, completion and stimulating practices for specific combinations of these geologic parameters. The engineering best practices identified in this project may be applied to new or existing fields, to optimize gas reserves and project economics. I identified the best engineering practices for the different CBM basins in N.A and combined these results in the form of two decision charts that engineers may use to select best drilling and completion practices, as well as the optimal stimulation methods and fluids for specific geologic settings. The decision charts are presented in a Visual Basic Application software program to facilitate their use by engineers.
author2 Ayers, Walter B
author_facet Ayers, Walter B
Ramaswamy, Sunil
author Ramaswamy, Sunil
author_sort Ramaswamy, Sunil
title Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
title_short Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
title_full Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
title_fullStr Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
title_full_unstemmed Selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
title_sort selection of best drilling, completion and stimulation method for coalbed methane reservoirs
publisher Texas A&M University
publishDate 2008
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/85835
work_keys_str_mv AT ramaswamysunil selectionofbestdrillingcompletionandstimulationmethodforcoalbedmethanereservoirs
_version_ 1716503735968989184