Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs

Wildlife reintroduction programs are a type of conservation initiative meant to preserve biodiversity through the restoration of damaged areas and the reintroduction of extirpated species. Unfortunately, such reintroductions have a history of limited success, ad hoc procedures, and little focus on h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sutton, Alexandra E.
Other Authors: Lopez, Roel R.
Format: Others
Language:en_US
Published: 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-7204
id ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2009-08-7204
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-tamu.edu-oai-repository.tamu.edu-1969.1-ETD-TAMU-2009-08-72042013-01-08T10:41:34ZLeadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction ProgramsSutton, Alexandra E.conservation managementorganizational structurewhite-tailed sea eaglewildlife reintroductionWildlife reintroduction programs are a type of conservation initiative meant to preserve biodiversity through the restoration of damaged areas and the reintroduction of extirpated species. Unfortunately, such reintroductions have a history of limited success, ad hoc procedures, and little focus on hypothetico-deductive design. This study sought to identify some of the trends in the leadership, management, and structure of wildlife reintroduction programs through the use of a case study and survey. The survey was distributed to reintroduction practitioners and biologists worldwide in an attempt to identify patterns of organizational behavior within the field. Some general trends indicated that most reintroductions had active and monitoring phases of 4 or more years (59% and 75% of respondents respectively), adhered closely to World Conservation Union (IUCN) Reintroduction Guidelines (43% of respondents), had a somewhat hierarchical structure (50% of respondents), held annual long-term goal-setting meetings (56%), observed annual employee evaluations (63%), and underwent project evaluations annually, using both internal (74%) and external (39%) evaluative instruments. Opinion questions regarding the ultimate performance of the project indicated that although 75% of researchers felt that their project had made good progress, only 63% said that a formal evaluation had confirmed this statement.Lopez, Roel R.2010-10-12T22:31:41Z2010-10-14T16:07:02Z2010-10-12T22:31:41Z2010-10-14T16:07:02Z2009-082010-10-12August 2009BookThesisElectronic Thesistextapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-7204en_US
collection NDLTD
language en_US
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic conservation management
organizational structure
white-tailed sea eagle
wildlife reintroduction
spellingShingle conservation management
organizational structure
white-tailed sea eagle
wildlife reintroduction
Sutton, Alexandra E.
Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
description Wildlife reintroduction programs are a type of conservation initiative meant to preserve biodiversity through the restoration of damaged areas and the reintroduction of extirpated species. Unfortunately, such reintroductions have a history of limited success, ad hoc procedures, and little focus on hypothetico-deductive design. This study sought to identify some of the trends in the leadership, management, and structure of wildlife reintroduction programs through the use of a case study and survey. The survey was distributed to reintroduction practitioners and biologists worldwide in an attempt to identify patterns of organizational behavior within the field. Some general trends indicated that most reintroductions had active and monitoring phases of 4 or more years (59% and 75% of respondents respectively), adhered closely to World Conservation Union (IUCN) Reintroduction Guidelines (43% of respondents), had a somewhat hierarchical structure (50% of respondents), held annual long-term goal-setting meetings (56%), observed annual employee evaluations (63%), and underwent project evaluations annually, using both internal (74%) and external (39%) evaluative instruments. Opinion questions regarding the ultimate performance of the project indicated that although 75% of researchers felt that their project had made good progress, only 63% said that a formal evaluation had confirmed this statement.
author2 Lopez, Roel R.
author_facet Lopez, Roel R.
Sutton, Alexandra E.
author Sutton, Alexandra E.
author_sort Sutton, Alexandra E.
title Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
title_short Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
title_full Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
title_fullStr Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
title_full_unstemmed Leadership and Management of Wildlife Reintroduction Programs
title_sort leadership and management of wildlife reintroduction programs
publishDate 2010
url http://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2009-08-7204
work_keys_str_mv AT suttonalexandrae leadershipandmanagementofwildlifereintroductionprograms
_version_ 1716504661895151616