A defense of the knowledge argument
Defenders of the Knowledge Argument contend that physicalism is false because knowing all the physical truths is not sufficient to know all the truths about the world. In particular, proponents of the Knowledge Argument claim that physicalism is false because the truths about the character of consci...
Main Author: | DePoe, John Martin |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Fumerton, Richard A., 1949- |
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Iowa
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ir.uiowa.edu/etd/792 https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1977&context=etd |
Similar Items
-
Dissolving some dilemmas for acquaintance foundationalism
by: Cobb, Ryan Daniel
Published: (2016) -
Closing in on the constitution of consciousness
by: Steven M. Miller
Published: (2014-11-01) -
Mary’s Dilemma: A Novel Take On Jackson’s Famous Thought Experiment
by: Abolafia-Rosenzweig, Noah O
Published: (2012) -
Ways to Skin the Zombie Cat: A Look at the Problems Associated with Chalmers's Zombie-Argument
by: Clifton, Walter Scott
Published: (2006) -
Representations and Inhomogeneous Beings
by: László Ropolyi
Published: (2015-10-01)