An Investigation and Comparison of Accepted Design Methodologies for the Analysis of Laterally Loaded Foundations
Single piles and pile groups are frequently subjected to high lateral forces. The safety and functionality of many structures depends on the ability of the supporting pile foundation to resist the resulting lateral forces. In the analysis and design of laterally loaded piles, two criterions usual...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Others |
| Published: |
ScholarWorks@UNO
2003
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://scholarworks.uno.edu/td/55 http://scholarworks.uno.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1054&context=td |
| Summary: | Single piles and pile groups are frequently subjected to high lateral forces. The safety and functionality of many structures depends on the ability of the supporting pile foundation to resist the resulting lateral forces. In the analysis and design of laterally loaded piles, two criterions usually govern. First, the deflection at the working load should not be so excessive as to impair the proper function of the supporting member. Second, the ultimate strength of the pile should be high enough to take the load imposed on it under the worst loading condition. Typically, pile length, pile section, soil type, and pile restraint dictate the analysis. This paper presents different methods, specifically Broms' method and the p-y method, for both the analysis and design of laterally loaded single piles. Both linear and nonlinear analyses are considered. The measured results of several full-scale field tests performed by Lymon Reese are compared to computed results using Broms' method of analysis and the p-y method of analysis. Observations are made as to the correlation between the results and recommendations are made as to the applicability of the accepted methods for the analysis and design of laterally loaded piles. |
|---|