The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam

The F-4 Phantom II was the United States' primary air superiority fighter aircraft during the Vietnam War. This airplane epitomized American airpower doctrine during the early Cold War, which diminished the role of air-to-air combat and the air superiority mission. As a result, the F-4 struggle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hankins, Michael W.
Other Authors: Citino, Robert
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: University of North Texas 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc283785/
id ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc283785
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-unt.edu-info-ark-67531-metadc2837852017-03-17T08:40:47Z The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam Hankins, Michael W. Vietnam airpower fighter aircraft military aviation F-4 Phantom The F-4 Phantom II was the United States' primary air superiority fighter aircraft during the Vietnam War. This airplane epitomized American airpower doctrine during the early Cold War, which diminished the role of air-to-air combat and the air superiority mission. As a result, the F-4 struggled against the Soviet MiG fighters used by the North Vietnamese Air Force. By the end of the Rolling Thunder bombing campaign in 1968, the Phantom traded kills with MiGs at a nearly one-to-one ratio, the worst air combat performance in American history. The aircraft also regularly failed to protect American bombing formations from MiG attacks. A bombing halt from 1968 to 1972 provided a chance for American planners to evaluate their performance and make changes. The Navy began training pilots specifically for air combat, creating the Navy Fighter Weapons School known as "Top Gun" for this purpose. The Air Force instead focused on technological innovation and upgrades to their equipment. The resumption of bombing and air combat in the 1972 Linebacker campaigns proved that the Navy's training practices were effective, while the Air Force's technology changes were not, with kill ratios becoming worse. However, the last three months of the campaign introduced an American ground radar system that proved more effective than Top Gun in improving air-to-air combat performance. By the end of the Vietnam War, the Air Force and Navy overcame the inherent problems with the Phantom, which were mostly of their own making. University of North Texas Citino, Robert Leggiere, Michael Fuhrmann, Christopher 2013-08 Thesis or Dissertation Text https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc283785/ ark: ark:/67531/metadc283785 English Public Hankins, Michael W. Copyright Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved.
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Vietnam
airpower
fighter aircraft
military aviation
F-4 Phantom
spellingShingle Vietnam
airpower
fighter aircraft
military aviation
F-4 Phantom
Hankins, Michael W.
The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
description The F-4 Phantom II was the United States' primary air superiority fighter aircraft during the Vietnam War. This airplane epitomized American airpower doctrine during the early Cold War, which diminished the role of air-to-air combat and the air superiority mission. As a result, the F-4 struggled against the Soviet MiG fighters used by the North Vietnamese Air Force. By the end of the Rolling Thunder bombing campaign in 1968, the Phantom traded kills with MiGs at a nearly one-to-one ratio, the worst air combat performance in American history. The aircraft also regularly failed to protect American bombing formations from MiG attacks. A bombing halt from 1968 to 1972 provided a chance for American planners to evaluate their performance and make changes. The Navy began training pilots specifically for air combat, creating the Navy Fighter Weapons School known as "Top Gun" for this purpose. The Air Force instead focused on technological innovation and upgrades to their equipment. The resumption of bombing and air combat in the 1972 Linebacker campaigns proved that the Navy's training practices were effective, while the Air Force's technology changes were not, with kill ratios becoming worse. However, the last three months of the campaign introduced an American ground radar system that proved more effective than Top Gun in improving air-to-air combat performance. By the end of the Vietnam War, the Air Force and Navy overcame the inherent problems with the Phantom, which were mostly of their own making.
author2 Citino, Robert
author_facet Citino, Robert
Hankins, Michael W.
author Hankins, Michael W.
author_sort Hankins, Michael W.
title The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
title_short The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
title_full The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
title_fullStr The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
title_full_unstemmed The Phantom Menace: the F-4 in Air Combat in Vietnam
title_sort phantom menace: the f-4 in air combat in vietnam
publisher University of North Texas
publishDate 2013
url https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc283785/
work_keys_str_mv AT hankinsmichaelw thephantommenacethef4inaircombatinvietnam
AT hankinsmichaelw phantommenacethef4inaircombatinvietnam
_version_ 1718431992762073088