Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy

How have we come to hear melody as going “up” or “down”? Why does the Western world predominantly adopt spatial terms such as “high” and “low” to distinguish musical notes while other non-Western cultures use non-spatial terms such as “large” and “small” (Bali), or “clear” and “dull” (South Korea)?...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Park, Joon
Other Authors: Boss, Jack
Language:en_US
Published: University of Oregon 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19354
id ndltd-uoregon.edu-oai-scholarsbank.uoregon.edu-1794-19354
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-uoregon.edu-oai-scholarsbank.uoregon.edu-1794-193542019-05-23T16:30:28Z Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy Park, Joon Boss, Jack Function History of music theory Monochord Musical motion Neo-Riemannian analysis Tonnetz How have we come to hear melody as going “up” or “down”? Why does the Western world predominantly adopt spatial terms such as “high” and “low” to distinguish musical notes while other non-Western cultures use non-spatial terms such as “large” and “small” (Bali), or “clear” and “dull” (South Korea)? Have the changing concepts of motion and space in people’s everyday lives over history also changed our understanding of musical space? My dissertation investigates the Western concept of music space as it has been shaped by social change into the way we think about music today. In our understanding of music, the concept of the underlying space is so elemental that it is impossible for us to have any fruitful discourse about music without using inherently spatial terms. For example a term interval in music denotes the distance between two combined notes; but, in fact, two sonic objects are neither near nor far from each other. This shows that our experience of hearing interval as a combination of different notes is not inherent in the sound itself but constructed through cultural and social means. In Western culture, musical sound is often conceptualized through various metaphors whose source domains reflect the society that incubated these metaphorical understandings. My research investigates the historical formation of the conceptual metaphor of music. In particular, I focus on historical formation of the three underlying assumptions we bring to our hearing of music: (1) “high” and “low” notes and motion between them, (2) functionality of musical chords, and (3) reliance on music notation. In each chapter, I contextualize various music theoretical writings within the larger framework of philosophy and social theory to show that our current understanding of musical sound is embedded with the history of Western culture. 2015-08-18T23:14:51Z 2015-08-18T23:14:51Z 2015-08-18 Electronic Thesis or Dissertation http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19354 en_US Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US University of Oregon
collection NDLTD
language en_US
sources NDLTD
topic Function
History of music theory
Monochord
Musical motion
Neo-Riemannian analysis
Tonnetz
spellingShingle Function
History of music theory
Monochord
Musical motion
Neo-Riemannian analysis
Tonnetz
Park, Joon
Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
description How have we come to hear melody as going “up” or “down”? Why does the Western world predominantly adopt spatial terms such as “high” and “low” to distinguish musical notes while other non-Western cultures use non-spatial terms such as “large” and “small” (Bali), or “clear” and “dull” (South Korea)? Have the changing concepts of motion and space in people’s everyday lives over history also changed our understanding of musical space? My dissertation investigates the Western concept of music space as it has been shaped by social change into the way we think about music today. In our understanding of music, the concept of the underlying space is so elemental that it is impossible for us to have any fruitful discourse about music without using inherently spatial terms. For example a term interval in music denotes the distance between two combined notes; but, in fact, two sonic objects are neither near nor far from each other. This shows that our experience of hearing interval as a combination of different notes is not inherent in the sound itself but constructed through cultural and social means. In Western culture, musical sound is often conceptualized through various metaphors whose source domains reflect the society that incubated these metaphorical understandings. My research investigates the historical formation of the conceptual metaphor of music. In particular, I focus on historical formation of the three underlying assumptions we bring to our hearing of music: (1) “high” and “low” notes and motion between them, (2) functionality of musical chords, and (3) reliance on music notation. In each chapter, I contextualize various music theoretical writings within the larger framework of philosophy and social theory to show that our current understanding of musical sound is embedded with the history of Western culture.
author2 Boss, Jack
author_facet Boss, Jack
Park, Joon
author Park, Joon
author_sort Park, Joon
title Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
title_short Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
title_full Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
title_fullStr Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
title_full_unstemmed Music, Motion, and Space: A Genealogy
title_sort music, motion, and space: a genealogy
publisher University of Oregon
publishDate 2015
url http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19354
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjoon musicmotionandspaceagenealogy
_version_ 1719192112431366144