Ethics of Argument in Perelman and Gadamer
This study investigates ethical argumentation in Perelman and Gadamer to claim that the central theoretical framework in each philosophy simultaneously inflects and deflects available avenues of persuasion. I argue in each system there is a “confused notion” whose ambiguity underpins...
Main Author: | Major, Julia |
---|---|
Other Authors: | Frank, David |
Language: | en_US |
Published: |
University of Oregon
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/1794/22648 |
Similar Items
-
“Un cimetière et des avions” : argumentation et valeurs dans le courrier des lecteurs d’un journal local
by: Marianne Doury
Published: (2010-10-01) -
The Social Nature of Argumentative Practices: The Philosophy of Argument and Audience Reception
by: Paula Olmos
Published: (2018-03-01) -
ARGUMENTO, ARGUMENTAÇÃO E AUDITÓRIO UNIVERSAL:
A NOVA RETÓRICA DE PERELMAN
by: Lazarotto, Claudia Candida
Published: (2009) -
Studying Rhetorical Audiences – a Call for Qualitative Reception Studies in Argumentation and Rhetoric
by: Jens Elmelund Kjeldsen
Published: (2016-07-01) -
The Ethics of Argumentation
by: Vasco Correia
Published: (2012-06-01)