Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting

The primary focus of nursing education in the 21st century is to graduate students with well-developed critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. This descriptive case study explored the perceptions of 6 faculty and 6 unit staff nurses concerning the assessment of critical thinking and clinica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: ScholarWorks 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3110
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4213&context=dissertations
id ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-4213
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-waldenu.edu-oai-scholarworks.waldenu.edu-dissertations-42132019-10-30T01:10:51Z Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn The primary focus of nursing education in the 21st century is to graduate students with well-developed critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. This descriptive case study explored the perceptions of 6 faculty and 6 unit staff nurses concerning the assessment of critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills of nursing students in the clinical setting. Benner's novice to expert theory served as the conceptual framework for the research. The guiding research questions focused on faculty and staff perceptions concerning unit staff nurses' level of preparedness to assess the critical thinking and clinical reasoning ability of nursing students, and explored how faculty and unit staff nurses perceived the process of evaluating nursing students' clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills in the clinical setting. Data were collected using semi structured interview questions, then coded and analyzed following Creswell's approach. This analysis identified six themes: (a) lack of consistency, (b) faculty and staff clinical expectations of students, (c) barriers to clinical education, (d) faculty and staff differences in educational definitions, (e) faculty and staff comfort level with students, and (f) resources needed for clinical education. Learning how faculty and staff nurses assess student nurses' ability to demonstrate effective clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills can positively impact social change in nursing education on the local and state level by informing best practice in how critical thinking and clinical reasoning are taught and assessed in nursing education. This facilitates graduating nurses who are prepared to deliver patient care that affect positive outcomes. 2016-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3110 https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4213&context=dissertations Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies en ScholarWorks clinical education clinical reasoning critical thinking dedicated educational unit faculty staff nurses Education Nursing
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic clinical education
clinical reasoning
critical thinking
dedicated educational unit
faculty
staff nurses
Education
Nursing
spellingShingle clinical education
clinical reasoning
critical thinking
dedicated educational unit
faculty
staff nurses
Education
Nursing
LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn
Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
description The primary focus of nursing education in the 21st century is to graduate students with well-developed critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills. This descriptive case study explored the perceptions of 6 faculty and 6 unit staff nurses concerning the assessment of critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills of nursing students in the clinical setting. Benner's novice to expert theory served as the conceptual framework for the research. The guiding research questions focused on faculty and staff perceptions concerning unit staff nurses' level of preparedness to assess the critical thinking and clinical reasoning ability of nursing students, and explored how faculty and unit staff nurses perceived the process of evaluating nursing students' clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills in the clinical setting. Data were collected using semi structured interview questions, then coded and analyzed following Creswell's approach. This analysis identified six themes: (a) lack of consistency, (b) faculty and staff clinical expectations of students, (c) barriers to clinical education, (d) faculty and staff differences in educational definitions, (e) faculty and staff comfort level with students, and (f) resources needed for clinical education. Learning how faculty and staff nurses assess student nurses' ability to demonstrate effective clinical reasoning and critical thinking skills can positively impact social change in nursing education on the local and state level by informing best practice in how critical thinking and clinical reasoning are taught and assessed in nursing education. This facilitates graduating nurses who are prepared to deliver patient care that affect positive outcomes.
author LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn
author_facet LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn
author_sort LeGrande, Stefanie Lynn
title Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
title_short Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
title_full Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
title_fullStr Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Clinical Reasoning of Nursing Students in the Clinical Setting
title_sort evaluation of clinical reasoning of nursing students in the clinical setting
publisher ScholarWorks
publishDate 2016
url https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/3110
https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4213&context=dissertations
work_keys_str_mv AT legrandestefanielynn evaluationofclinicalreasoningofnursingstudentsintheclinicalsetting
_version_ 1719281330532909056