The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage

A comparison of the bathymetric surveys of the 1850-series and 1950-series indicated an average sedimentation rate for the Virginia Chesapeake Bay of 0.55 m (1.81 ft) for the last century. A statistically significant relationship between the depth of water and the rate of sedimentation was found whe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carron, Michael J.
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: W&M ScholarWorks 1979
Subjects:
Online Access:https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539616599
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2167&context=etd
id ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-2167
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-wm.edu-oai-scholarworks.wm.edu-etd-21672021-05-05T05:42:04Z The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage Carron, Michael J. A comparison of the bathymetric surveys of the 1850-series and 1950-series indicated an average sedimentation rate for the Virginia Chesapeake Bay of 0.55 m (1.81 ft) for the last century. A statistically significant relationship between the depth of water and the rate of sedimentation was found where high rates of sedimentation exist in extremely shallow water (0 to 2 m) and in intermediate depths (6 to 13 m), while low rates exist between 2 m and 6 m, and in some cases in water deeper than 13 m. The results of 900 km of continuous seismic reflection profiles taken in the Virginia and lower-Maryland Chesapeake Bay indicate that the ancestral Rappahannock, Piankatank, York, and James rivers were not tributary to the ancestral Susquehanna River during the Wisconsin Glaciation as was previously believed. The ancestral Rappahannock, Piankatank, and York rivers converge and flow out of the present bay area through a paleochannel located under Tail of the Horseshoe Shoal on the south side of the Bay entrance. These combined rivers probably converged with the ancestral James River somewhere on the present continental shelf. A paleochannel in the Mainstem of the Bay north of the Potomac River mouth has an apparent thalweg depth of -42 m (-138 ft), whereas a much deeper channel at -61 m (-200 ft) has been reported by Ryan (1953) in the upper bay reaches. This suggests that the Susquehanna did not flow in the Mainstem region during the Wisconsinan Glaciation and most probably flowed in the Tangier Sound region. No evidence was found to support theories concerning the existence of significant Post-Tertiary crustal movement in the lower Bay region. 1979-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539616599 https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2167&context=etd © The Author Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects English W&M ScholarWorks Geology Oceanography
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Geology
Oceanography
spellingShingle Geology
Oceanography
Carron, Michael J.
The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
description A comparison of the bathymetric surveys of the 1850-series and 1950-series indicated an average sedimentation rate for the Virginia Chesapeake Bay of 0.55 m (1.81 ft) for the last century. A statistically significant relationship between the depth of water and the rate of sedimentation was found where high rates of sedimentation exist in extremely shallow water (0 to 2 m) and in intermediate depths (6 to 13 m), while low rates exist between 2 m and 6 m, and in some cases in water deeper than 13 m. The results of 900 km of continuous seismic reflection profiles taken in the Virginia and lower-Maryland Chesapeake Bay indicate that the ancestral Rappahannock, Piankatank, York, and James rivers were not tributary to the ancestral Susquehanna River during the Wisconsin Glaciation as was previously believed. The ancestral Rappahannock, Piankatank, and York rivers converge and flow out of the present bay area through a paleochannel located under Tail of the Horseshoe Shoal on the south side of the Bay entrance. These combined rivers probably converged with the ancestral James River somewhere on the present continental shelf. A paleochannel in the Mainstem of the Bay north of the Potomac River mouth has an apparent thalweg depth of -42 m (-138 ft), whereas a much deeper channel at -61 m (-200 ft) has been reported by Ryan (1953) in the upper bay reaches. This suggests that the Susquehanna did not flow in the Mainstem region during the Wisconsinan Glaciation and most probably flowed in the Tangier Sound region. No evidence was found to support theories concerning the existence of significant Post-Tertiary crustal movement in the lower Bay region.
author Carron, Michael J.
author_facet Carron, Michael J.
author_sort Carron, Michael J.
title The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
title_short The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
title_full The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
title_fullStr The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
title_full_unstemmed The Virginia Chesapeake Bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
title_sort virginia chesapeake bay: recent sedimentation and paleodrainage
publisher W&M ScholarWorks
publishDate 1979
url https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd/1539616599
https://scholarworks.wm.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2167&context=etd
work_keys_str_mv AT carronmichaelj thevirginiachesapeakebayrecentsedimentationandpaleodrainage
AT carronmichaelj virginiachesapeakebayrecentsedimentationandpaleodrainage
_version_ 1719403025313824768