Chapter 16 Military Samhandling : Formal and Informal Behaviour in Norway's Armed Forces

"The chapter describes and discusses interaction within the Norwegian Armed Forces. Military interaction is understood as the dynamic and sometimes unpredictable action undertaken when two or more services interact. The chapter explores why interaction between military services, such as land...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heier, Tormod (auth)
Format: eBook
Published: Oslo Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02902naaaa2200337uu 4500
001 28305
005 20181008
020 |a noasp.36.ch16 
024 7 |a 10.23865/noasp.36.ch16  |c doi 
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Heier, Tormod  |e auth 
245 1 0 |a Chapter 16 Military Samhandling : Formal and Informal Behaviour in Norway's Armed Forces 
260 |a Oslo  |b Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing)  |c 2018 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (18 p.) 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/28305 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a "The chapter describes and discusses interaction within the Norwegian Armed Forces. Military interaction is understood as the dynamic and sometimes unpredictable action undertaken when two or more services interact. The chapter explores why interaction between military services, such as land, sea and air forces, is difficult - and, in some circumstances, completely absent. How can inadequate interaction between the military branches be explained? As Europe's armed forces become increasingly complex and sophisticated, two perspectives from organisational theory are applied. First, an instrumental perspective is used to comprehend the problem. Particular attention is paid to the tension between hierarchical authority and the division of labour. Thereafter, a cultural perspective is used to comprehend inter-service rivalry. Here, attention is paid to informal rules and regulations, or habitual 'rules of thumb' that have become institutionalised over time. These 'the behavioural patterns' affect the way military services perceive themselves in contrast to others. The main finding is that Norway's Armed Forces suffer from 'limited rationality'. This is because Norway's military units operate within a fragmented command structure that consists of many different sub-organisations; individually, in times of peace in Norway, they pursue their own myopic agendas rather than a comprehensive national objective. In this process, the branches are also forced to compromise with each other to reach their individual objectives. A form of limited rationality therefore arises because the Army, Navy and Air Force act rationally. This is, however, not on the basis of what serves Norwegian security best, but on the basis of what is rational for their specific branch." 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Society & social sciences  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Warfare & defence  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Civil defence  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Samhandling 
653 |a interaction 
653 |a subcultures 
653 |a military 
653 |a organisational learning 
653 |a leadership 
653 |a unforeseen 
773 1 0 |0 OAPEN Library ID: 1001657  |t Interaction: 'Samhandling' Under Risk  |7 nnaa