The Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought

This study tries to reconstruct the dispute over rhetoric in Hellenistic thought, by using two main interrelated axes. Firstly, it delineates the exact milieu in which this dispute took place, including locations, dates and persons. Secondly, five main arguments used against rhetoric have been recon...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liebersohn, Yosef Z. (auth)
Format: eBook
Published: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 20100915
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 01291naaaa2200349uu 4500
001 31568
005 20170301
020 |a 9783666252945 
020 |a 9783666252945 
024 7 |a 10.13109/9783666252945  |c doi 
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Liebersohn, Yosef Z.  |e auth 
245 1 0 |a The Dispute Concerning Rhetoric in Hellenistic Thought 
260 |b Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht  |c 20100915 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/31568 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a This study tries to reconstruct the dispute over rhetoric in Hellenistic thought, by using two main interrelated axes. Firstly, it delineates the exact milieu in which this dispute took place, including locations, dates and persons. Secondly, five main arguments used against rhetoric have been reconstructed, all of which concentrate on rhetoric's claim to be considered an art. 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Classics 
653 |a Charmadas 
653 |a Cicero 
653 |a Critolaus 
653 |a Orator 
653 |a Philodemus 
653 |a Plato 
653 |a Quintilian 
653 |a Rhetoric 
653 |a Stoicism