Understanding Society and Natural Resources: Forging New Strands of Integration Across the Social Sciences

In this edited volume leading scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds wrestle with social science integration opportunities and challenges. This book explores the growing concern of how best to achieve effective integration of the social science disciplines as a means for furthering natural...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Other Authors: Manfredo, Michael J. (Editor), Vaske, Jerry J. (Editor), Rechkemmer, Andreas (Editor), Duke, Esther A. (Editor)
Format: eBook
Published: Springer Nature 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 03638naaaa2200589uu 4500
001 32706
005 20161231
020 |a 978-94-017-8959-2 
024 7 |a 10.1007/978-94-017-8959-2  |c doi 
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Manfredo, Michael J.  |e edt 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u http://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32706 
700 1 |a Vaske, Jerry J.  |e edt 
700 1 |a Rechkemmer, Andreas  |e edt 
700 1 |a Duke, Esther A.  |e edt 
700 1 |a Manfredo, Michael J.  |e oth 
700 1 |a Vaske, Jerry J.  |e oth 
700 1 |a Rechkemmer, Andreas  |e oth 
700 1 |a Duke, Esther A.  |e oth 
245 1 0 |a Understanding Society and Natural Resources: Forging New Strands of Integration Across the Social Sciences 
260 |b Springer Nature  |c 2014 
300 |a 1 electronic resource (288 p.) 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a In this edited volume leading scholars from different disciplinary backgrounds wrestle with social science integration opportunities and challenges. This book explores the growing concern of how best to achieve effective integration of the social science disciplines as a means for furthering natural resource social science and environmental problem solving. The chapters provide an overview of the history, vision, advances, examples and methods that could lead to integration. The quest for integration among the social sciences is not new. Some argue that the social sciences have lagged in their advancements and contributions to society due to their inability to address integration related issues. Integration merits debate for a number of reasons. First, natural resource issues are complex and are affected by multiple proximate driving social factors. Single disciplinary studies focused at one level are unlikely to provide explanations that represent this complexity and are limited in their ability to inform policy recommendations. Complex problems are best explored across disciplines that examine social-ecological phenomenon from different scales. Second, multi-disciplinary initiatives such as those with physical and biological scientists are necessary to understand the scope of the social sciences. Too frequently there is a belief that one social scientist on a multi-disciplinary team provides adequate social science representation. Third, more complete models of human behavior will be achieved through a synthesis of diverse social science perspectives. 
536 |a FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Sociology  |2 bicssc 
653 |a social science integration opportunities and challenges 
653 |a water managing 
653 |a social ecological systems 
653 |a status of integration 
653 |a humanity and the biosphere (mahb) 
653 |a representing human individuals 
653 |a environmental problem solving 
653 |a human sustainability 
653 |a livelihoods 
653 |a poverty and conservation 
653 |a resouce challenges and conflicts 
653 |a emerging infectious diseases 
653 |a land degradation and desertification 
653 |a risk governance research 
653 |a science during crisis 
653 |a facilitating social science integration 
653 |a land change research and modeling 
653 |a solving sustainability challenges 
653 |a natural resource social science integration 
653 |a the social-ecological system framework 
653 |a climate change and society 
653 |a Decision-making 
653 |a Socio-ecological system