The Science Communication Challenge : Truth and Disagreement in Democratic Knowledge Societies

The Science Communication Challenge explores and discusses the whys - as distinct from the hows - of science communication. Arguing that the dominant science communication paradigm is didactic, it makes the case for a political category of science communication, aimed at furthering discussions of sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Meyer, Gitte (auth)
Format: eBook
Published: Anthem Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:Get fulltext
LEADER 02261naaaa2200289uu 4500
001 52809
005 20220212
041 0 |h English 
042 |a dc 
100 1 |a Meyer, Gitte  |e auth 
245 1 0 |a The Science Communication Challenge : Truth and Disagreement in Democratic Knowledge Societies 
260 |b Anthem Press  |c 2018 
856 |z Get fulltext  |u https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/52809 
506 0 |a Open Access  |2 star  |f Unrestricted online access 
520 |a The Science Communication Challenge explores and discusses the whys - as distinct from the hows - of science communication. Arguing that the dominant science communication paradigm is didactic, it makes the case for a political category of science communication, aimed at furthering discussions of science-related public affairs and making room for civilized and reasonable exchanges between different points of view. As civil societies and knowledge societies, modern democratic societies are confronted with the challenge of accommodating both the scientific logic of truth-seeking and the classical political logic of pluralism. The didactic science communication paradigm, however, is unsuited to dealing with substantial disagreement. Therefore, it is also unsuited to facilitate communication about the steadily increasing number of science-related political issues. Using insights from an array of academic fields, The Science Communication Challenge explores the possible origins of the didactic paradigm, connecting it to particular understandings of knowledge, politics and the public and to the widespread assumption of a science-versus-politics dichotomy. The book offers a critique of that assumption and suggests that science and politics be seen as substantially different activities, suited to dealing with different kinds of questions - and to different varieties of science communication. 
536 |a Knowledge Unlatched 
540 |a Creative Commons 
546 |a English 
650 7 |a Philosophy of science  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a Social & political philosophy  |2 bicssc 
650 7 |a History of science  |2 bicssc 
653 |a Science 
653 |a Philosophy & Social Aspects 
653 |a Philosophy 
653 |a Political 
653 |a Science 
653 |a History