Comparing Desktop vs. Mobile Interaction for the Creation of Pervasive Augmented Reality Experiences

This paper presents an evaluation and comparison of interaction methods for the configuration and visualization of pervasive Augmented Reality (AR) experiences using two different platforms: desktop and mobile. AR experiences consist of the enhancement of real-world environments by superimposing add...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dias, P. (Author), Madeira, T. (Author), Marques, B. (Author), Neves, P. (Author), Santos, B.S (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02641nam a2200241Ia 4500
001 0.3390-jimaging8030079
008 220421s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 2313433X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Comparing Desktop vs. Mobile Interaction for the Creation of Pervasive Augmented Reality Experiences 
260 0 |b MDPI  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging8030079 
520 3 |a This paper presents an evaluation and comparison of interaction methods for the configuration and visualization of pervasive Augmented Reality (AR) experiences using two different platforms: desktop and mobile. AR experiences consist of the enhancement of real-world environments by superimposing additional layers of information, real-time interaction, and accurate 3D registration of virtual and real objects. Pervasive AR extends this concept through experiences that are continuous in space, being aware of and responsive to the user’s context and pose. Currently, the time and technical expertise required to create such applications are the main reasons preventing its widespread use. As such, authoring tools which facilitate the development and configuration of pervasive AR experiences have become progressively more relevant. Their operation often involves the navigation of the real-world scene and the use of the AR equipment itself to add the augmented information within the environment. The proposed experimental tool makes use of 3D scans from physical environments to provide a reconstructed digital replica of such spaces for a desktop-based method, and to enable positional tracking for a mobile-based one. While the desktop platform represents a non-immersive setting, the mobile one provides continuous AR in the physical environment. Both versions can be used to place virtual content and ultimately configure an AR experience. The authoring capabilities of the different platforms were compared by conducting a user study focused on evaluating their usability. Although the AR interface was generally considered more intuitive, the desktop platform shows promise in several aspects, such as remote configuration, lower required effort, and overall better scalability. © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 
650 0 4 |a 3D reconstruction 
650 0 4 |a human–computer interaction 
650 0 4 |a interaction paradigms 
650 0 4 |a pervasive augmented reality 
650 0 4 |a user study 
700 1 0 |a Dias, P.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Madeira, T.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Marques, B.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Neves, P.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Santos, B.S.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Imaging