The utility of PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of psychosis: a brief review

Purpose: Advances in the pathophysiological characterization of psychosis has led to a newfound role of biomarkers in diagnostic and prognostic contexts. Further, advances in the accuracy and sensitivity of nuclear medicine imaging techniques, and specifically positron emission tomography (PET), hav...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alavi, A. (Author), Ayubcha, C. (Author), Revheim, M.-E (Author), Rigney, G. (Author), Werner, T.J (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03891nam a2200505Ia 4500
001 10-1007-s40336-021-00466-5
008 220420s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 22815872 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The utility of PET imaging in the diagnosis and management of psychosis: a brief review 
260 0 |b Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH  |c 2022 
300 |a 10 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-021-00466-5 
520 3 |a Purpose: Advances in the pathophysiological characterization of psychosis has led to a newfound role of biomarkers in diagnostic and prognostic contexts. Further, advances in the accuracy and sensitivity of nuclear medicine imaging techniques, and specifically positron emission tomography (PET), have improved the ability to diagnose and manage individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis or those at greater risk for developing psychosis. Methods: Literature searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science to identify papers related to the use of PET imaging in the diagnosis or management of psychosis. Search terms used included “positron emission tomography”, “PET imaging”, “psychosis”, “disorders of psychosis”, “schizophrenia”, “biomarkers”, “diagnostic biomarkers”, “prognostic biomarker”, “monitoring biomarker”, “outcome biomarker”, and “predictive biomarker.” Results: Studies included fell into three categories: those examining microglia, those studying dopamine synthesis capacity, and those examining acetylcholine receptor activity. Microglial imaging has been shown to be ineffective in all patients with psychosis, but some believe it shows promise in a subset of patients with psychosis, although no defining characteristics of said subset have been postulated. Studies of dopamine synthesis capacity suggest that presynaptic dopamine is reliably elevated in patients with psychosis, but levels of dopamine active transporter are not. Further, positron emission tomography (PET) with [18F]fluoro-l-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([18F]FDOPA)-PET has been recently used successfully as a predictive biomarker of dopaminergic treatment response, although more work is needed to validate such findings. Finally, existing studies have also documented lower levels of binding to the α7 nicotinic cholinergic receptor (α7-nAChR) via [18F]-ASEM PET in patients with psychosis, however there is a dearth of prospective, randomized studies evaluating the efficacy of [18F]-ASEM as a diagnostic or monitoring biomarker of any kind. Conclusion: Molecular imaging has become a useful tool in the diagnosis and management of psychosis. Further work must be done to improve the comparative prognostic value and diagnostic accuracy of different radiotracers. © 2021, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a biological marker 
650 0 4 |a bungarotoxin receptor 
650 0 4 |a comparative effectiveness 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic accuracy 
650 0 4 |a dopamine metabolism 
650 0 4 |a efficacy parameters 
650 0 4 |a FDOPA 
650 0 4 |a First-episode psychosis 
650 0 4 |a fluorodeoxyglucose f 18 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a imaging 
650 0 4 |a microglia 
650 0 4 |a Microglia 
650 0 4 |a molecular imaging 
650 0 4 |a outcome assessment 
650 0 4 |a PET imaging 
650 0 4 |a positron emission tomography 
650 0 4 |a prediction 
650 0 4 |a predictive value 
650 0 4 |a prospective study 
650 0 4 |a psychosis 
650 0 4 |a Psychosis 
650 0 4 |a randomized controlled trial (topic) 
650 0 4 |a Review 
650 0 4 |a systematic review 
650 0 4 |a treatment response 
700 1 0 |a Alavi, A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Ayubcha, C.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Revheim, M.-E.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rigney, G.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Werner, T.J.  |e author 
773 |t Clinical and Translational Imaging