Advocating for a New Residency Application Process: A Student Perspective

• Main Authors: Alseidi, A.A (Author), Badiee, R.K (Author), Campbell, A.R (Author), Hernandez, S. (Author), NnamaniSilva, O.N (Author), Valdez, J.J (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier Inc. 2022
• Subjects: adoption; adult; article; COVID-19; diversity; equity; human; Humans; inclusion; Internship and Residency; interview; justice; medical education; pandemic; Pandemics; residency match; rotation; SARS-CoV-2; student; Students; virtual interviews
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity for surgical residency programs to rethink their methods of evaluating and recruiting candidates. However, the past year has not been seamless, with a soaring number of applications, reports of programs and applicants having difficulty evaluating each other, and an increasingly uneven distribution of interviews among applicants. Consequently, many have called for national changes to the residency application process to address these longstanding concerns. Results: Here, we review the evolving literature and advocate for the permanent adoption of visiting rotations, virtual interviews with a universal release date and data-driven attendance limits, and opportunities for in-person applicant visits. Conclusions: We believe these changes leverage the strengths of each format, allow for satisfactory bidirectional evaluation, and promote principles of justice, equity, diversity, and inclusion. © 2021