Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force

Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Augustovski, F. (Author), Briggs, A.H (Author), Carswell, C. (Author), Caulley, L. (Author), Chaiyakunapruk, N. (Author), de Bekker-Grob, E. (Author), Drummond, M. (Author), Greenberg, D. (Author), Husereau, D. (Author), Loder, E. (Author), Mauskopf, J. (Author), Mullins, C.D (Author), Petrou, S. (Author), Pwu, R.-F (Author), Staniszewska, S. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04050nam a2200757Ia 4500
001 10-1016-j-jval-2021-10-008
008 220420s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10983015 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) 2022 Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR CHEERS II Good Practices Task Force 
260 0 |b Elsevier Ltd  |c 2022 
300 |a 22 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008 
520 3 |a Health economic evaluations are comparative analyses of alternative courses of action in terms of their costs and consequences. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement, published in 2013, was created to ensure health economic evaluations are identifiable, interpretable, and useful for decision making. It was intended as guidance to help authors report accurately which health interventions were being compared and in what context, how the evaluation was undertaken, what the findings were, and other details that may aid readers and reviewers in interpretation and use of the study. The new CHEERS 2022 statement replaces the previous CHEERS reporting guidance. It reflects the need for guidance that can be more easily applied to all types of health economic evaluation, new methods and developments in the field, and the increased role of stakeholder involvement including patients and the public. It is also broadly applicable to any form of intervention intended to improve the health of individuals or the population, whether simple or complex, and without regard to context (such as healthcare, public health, education, and social care). This Explanation and Elaboration Report presents the new CHEERS 2022 28-item checklist with recommendations and explanation and examples for each item. The CHEERS 2022 statement is primarily intended for researchers reporting economic evaluations for peer-reviewed journals and the peer reviewers and editors assessing them for publication. Nevertheless, we anticipate familiarity with reporting requirements will be useful for analysts when planning studies. It may also be useful for health technology assessment bodies seeking guidance on reporting, given that there is an increasing emphasis on transparency in decision making. © 2021 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a Biomedical Research 
650 0 4 |a biomedical technology assessment 
650 0 4 |a checklist 
650 0 4 |a Checklist 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a cost benefit analysis 
650 0 4 |a cost benefit analysis 
650 0 4 |a cost-benefit analysis 
650 0 4 |a Cost-Benefit Analysis 
650 0 4 |a decision making 
650 0 4 |a economic evaluation 
650 0 4 |a economics 
650 0 4 |a Economics, Medical 
650 0 4 |a editor 
650 0 4 |a education 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a guidelines 
650 0 4 |a health economics 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a medical research 
650 0 4 |a methods 
650 0 4 |a microeconomic analysis 
650 0 4 |a peer review 
650 0 4 |a Peer Review 
650 0 4 |a personnel 
650 0 4 |a practice guideline 
650 0 4 |a public health 
650 0 4 |a reporting 
650 0 4 |a Research Personnel 
650 0 4 |a social care 
650 0 4 |a stakeholder engagement 
650 0 4 |a Stakeholder Participation 
650 0 4 |a standards 
700 1 0 |a Augustovski, F.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Briggs, A.H.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Carswell, C.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Caulley, L.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Chaiyakunapruk, N.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a de Bekker-Grob, E.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Drummond, M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Greenberg, D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Husereau, D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Loder, E.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mauskopf, J.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Mullins, C.D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Petrou, S.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Pwu, R.-F.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Staniszewska, S.  |e author 
773 |t Value in Health