Evaluating the Balance Between Privacy and Access in Digital Information Sharing

OBJECTIVES: Access to personal health records in an ICU by persons involved in the patient’s care (referred to broadly as “family members” below) has the potential to increase engagement and reduce the negative psychologic sequelae of such hospitalizations. Currently, little is known about patient p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aboumatar, H. (Author), Beesley, S.J (Author), Brown, S.M (Author), Butler, A.M (Author), Butler, J. (Author), Francis, L. (Author), Groat, D. (Author), Hopkins, R.O (Author), Powell, A. (Author), Rozenblum, R. (Author), Sugarman, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 2022
Subjects:
age
sex
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04725nam a2200757Ia 4500
001 10-1097-CCM-0000000000005234
008 220420s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00903493 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Evaluating the Balance Between Privacy and Access in Digital Information Sharing 
260 0 |b Lippincott Williams and Wilkins  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000005234 
520 3 |a OBJECTIVES: Access to personal health records in an ICU by persons involved in the patient’s care (referred to broadly as “family members” below) has the potential to increase engagement and reduce the negative psychologic sequelae of such hospitalizations. Currently, little is known about patient preferences for information sharing with a designated family member in the ICU. We sought to understand the information-sharing preferences of former ICU patients and their family members and to identify predictors of information-sharing preferences. DESIGN: We performed an internet survey that was developed by a broad, multidisciplinary team of stakeholders. Formal pilot testing of the survey was conducted prior to internet survey administration to study subjects. SETTING: Internet survey. SUBJECTS: Subjects included English-speaking adults who had an ICU experience or a family member with ICU experience between 2013 and 2016. We used panel sampling to ensure an ethnically representative sample of the U.S. population. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One thousand five hundred twenty surveys were submitted, and 1,470 were included in analysis. The majority of respondents (93.6%) stated that they would want to share present and past medical history, either all or that related to their ICU stay, with a designated family member of their choosing. The majority (79%) would also want their designated family member to be able to access that information from a home computer. Although most respondents preferred to share all types of information, they indicated varying levels of willingness to share specific types of more sensitive information. Information-sharing preferences did not differ by age, sex, ethnicity, or type of prior experience in the ICU (i.e., patient or family member). CONCLUSIONS: In the context of an ICU admission, sharing personal health information with a person of the patient’s choosing appears desirable for most patients and family members. Policies and implementation of regulations should take this into consideration. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. 
650 0 4 |a access to information 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a age 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a Communication 
650 0 4 |a confidentiality 
650 0 4 |a Confidentiality 
650 0 4 |a data privacy 
650 0 4 |a Data sharing 
650 0 4 |a Digital information 
650 0 4 |a ethnicity 
650 0 4 |a Family engagement 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a health care delivery 
650 0 4 |a Health Services Accessibility 
650 0 4 |a hospitalization 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a information dissemination 
650 0 4 |a information dissemination 
650 0 4 |a Information Dissemination 
650 0 4 |a Intensive care 
650 0 4 |a intensive care unit 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a medical history 
650 0 4 |a medical information 
650 0 4 |a medical record 
650 0 4 |a middle aged 
650 0 4 |a Middle Aged 
650 0 4 |a multidisciplinary team 
650 0 4 |a Patient engagement 
650 0 4 |a patient preference 
650 0 4 |a Patient Preference 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a psychology 
650 0 4 |a questionnaire 
650 0 4 |a sex 
650 0 4 |a Surveys and Questionnaires 
700 1 0 |a Aboumatar, H.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Beesley, S.J.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Brown, S.M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Butler, A.M.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Butler, J.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Francis, L.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Groat, D.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Hopkins, R.O.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Powell, A.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Rozenblum, R.  |e author 
700 1 0 |a Sugarman, J.  |e author 
773 |t Critical Care Medicine