|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03302nam a2200589Ia 4500 |
001 |
10-11152-MU-3238 |
008 |
220420s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 18444172 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Feasibility of pneumoperitoneum diagnosis using point-of-care ultrasound: A pilot study using a fresh cadaver model
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Societatea Romana de Ultrasonografie in Medicina si Biologie
|c 2022
|
300 |
|
|
|a 7
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.11152/MU-3238
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Aims: To assess the accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) in the hands of two trained and blinded emergency physicians (EPs) in detecting very small amounts of free intraperitoneal air injected intra-abdominally, using a fresh human cadaver model. Material and methods: Fifteen cadavers were injected on 3 occasions with predefined quantities of free intraperitoneal air ranging from 0-10 mL. Seven cadavers were injected in the mid-epigastrium (ME), while 8 were injected in the left lower quadrant (LLQ). Each cadaver was scanned after each of the 3 injections by 2 trained and blinded EPs, resulting in 45 scans per sonographer. Scans were performed using previously validated and standardized techniques. All scans were recorded, time-stamped and labeled. For each scan the sonographers indicated “yes” or “no” to whether pneumoperitoneum was detected. A chi square analysis was performed to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PoCUS utilized by each sonographer of pneumoperitoneum based on the location and volume of air injected. Results: Free air (0.25-10 mL) injected into the ME was successfully diagnosed in 36/42 instances (86% sensitivity), but only detected in 10/36 instances when injected into the LLQ (28% sensitivity). Both EPs detected all air injections of ≥2 mL into the ME. Conclusion: Detection of free air originating from the midepigastric region may become a future PoCUS indication for adequately trained EPs. © 2022 Societatea Romana de Ultrasonografie in Medicina si Biologie. All rights reserved.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a abdomen
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cadaver
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cadaver
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cadaver
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a chi square test
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a diagnostic accuracy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a diagnostic test accuracy study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a echography
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a emergency medicine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Emergency medicine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a emergency physician
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a emergency ward
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Feasibility Studies
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a feasibility study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a left lower quadrant
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a mid epigastrium
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pilot Projects
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pilot study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pneumoperitoneum
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pneumoperitoneum
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pneumoperitoneum
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pneumoperitoneum
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a point of care system
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a point of care ultrasound
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Point-of-Care Systems
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Point-of-care ultrasound
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a sensitivity and specificity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a stomach
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Ultrasonography
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Carter, E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Dietrich, C.F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Herbst, M.K.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Hoffmann, B.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
0 |
|a Wu, S.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Medical Ultrasonography
|