Integrating an early child development intervention into an existing primary healthcare platform in rural Lesotho: a prospective case–control study

• Main Authors: Birru, E. (Author), Carmona, M. (Author), Curtain, J. (Author), Lerotholi, R. (Author), Mabathoana, J. (Author), McBain, R. (Author), Miller, A.C (Author), Mukherjee, J. (Author), Ndayizigiye, M. (Author), Nelson, A.K (Author), Rumaldo, N. (Author), Shin, S. (Author), Stulac, S. (Author), Whelley, C. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
• Subjects: adult; Article; caregiver; case control study; Case-Control Studies; child; Child; child development; Child Development; child parent relation; Child, Preschool; clinical assessment tool; community integration; controlled study; demographics; early childhood intervention; encouragement; Extended Age and Stage Questionnaire; female; health auxiliary; health care delivery; health care system; HIV & AIDS; home visit; household; human; Humans; infant; Infant; international health services; Lesotho; male; maternal medicine; mental health; motor development; Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey; newborn; paediatrics; Parent Ladder; Peru; pilot study; postnatal care; preschool child; primary health care; Primary Health Care; prospective study; public health; reading; rural health care; rural population; Rural Population; social evolution; social support; United Nations Children's Fund
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 ObjectivesThis study evaluated a novel early childhood development (ECD) programme integrated it into the primary healthcare system.SettingThe intervention was implemented in a rural district of Lesotho from 2017 to 2018.ParticipantsIt targeted primary caregivers during routine postnatal care visits and through village health worker home visits.InterventionThe hybrid care delivery model was adapted from a successful programme in Lima, Peru and focused on parent coaching for knowledge about child development, practicing contingent interaction with the child, parent social support and encouragement.Primary and secondary outcomes measuresWe compared developmental outcomes and caregiving practices in a cohort of 130 caregiver–infant (ages 7–11 months old) dyads who received the ECD intervention, to a control group that did not receive the intervention (n=125) using a case–control study design. Developmental outcomes were evaluated using the Extended Ages and Stages Questionnaire (EASQ), and caregiving practices using two measure sets (ie, UNICEF Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (MICS), Parent Ladder). Group comparisons were made using multivariable regression analyses, adjusting for caregiver-level, infant-level and household-level demographic characteristics.ResultsAt completion, children in the intervention group scored meaningfully higher across all EASQ domains, compared with children in the control group: communication (δ=0.21, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.26), social development (δ=0.27, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.8) and motor development (δ=0.33, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.31). Caregivers in the intervention group also reported significantly higher adjusted odds of engaging in positive caregiving practices in four of six MICS domains, compared with caregivers in the control group—including book reading (adjusted OR (AOR): 3.77, 95% CI 1.94 to 7.29) and naming/counting (AOR: 2.05; 95% CI 1.24 to 3.71).ConclusionsThese results suggest that integrating an ECD intervention into a rural primary care platform, such as in the Lesothoan context, may be an effective and efficient way to promote ECD outcomes. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.