Kinetics based reaction optimization of enzyme catalyzed reduction of formaldehyde to methanol with synchronous cofactor regeneration
Enzymatic reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to methanol (CH3OH) can be accomplished using a designed set-up of three oxidoreductases utilizing reduced pyridine nucleotide (NADH) as cofactor for the reducing equivalents electron supply. For this enzyme system to function efficiently a balanced regene...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | View Fulltext in Publisher View in Scopus |
LEADER | 04492nam a2200937Ia 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 10.1002-bit.26405 | ||
008 | 220120s2017 CNT 000 0 und d | ||
020 | |a 00063592 (ISSN) | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Kinetics based reaction optimization of enzyme catalyzed reduction of formaldehyde to methanol with synchronous cofactor regeneration |
260 | 0 | |b John Wiley and Sons Inc. |c 2017 | |
520 | 3 | |a Enzymatic reduction of carbon dioxide (CO2) to methanol (CH3OH) can be accomplished using a designed set-up of three oxidoreductases utilizing reduced pyridine nucleotide (NADH) as cofactor for the reducing equivalents electron supply. For this enzyme system to function efficiently a balanced regeneration of the reducing equivalents during reaction is required. Herein, we report the optimization of the enzymatic conversion of formaldehyde (CHOH) to CH3OH by alcohol dehydrogenase, the final step of the enzymatic redox reaction of CO2 to CH3OH, with kinetically synchronous enzymatic cofactor regeneration using either glucose dehydrogenase (System I) or xylose dehydrogenase (System II). A mathematical model of the enzyme kinetics was employed to identify the best reaction set-up for attaining optimal cofactor recycling rate and enzyme utilization efficiency. Targeted process optimization experiments were conducted to verify the kinetically modeled results. Repetitive reaction cycles were shown to enhance the yield of CH3OH, increase the total turnover number (TTN) and the biocatalytic productivity rate (BPR) value for both system I and II whilst minimizing the exposure of the enzymes to high concentrations of CHOH. System II was found to be superior to System I with a yield of 8 mM CH3OH, a TTN of 160 and BPR of 24 μmol CH3OH/U · h during 6 hr of reaction. The study demonstrates that an optimal reaction set-up could be designed from rational kinetics modeling to maximize the yield of CH3OH, whilst simultaneously optimizing cofactor recycling and enzyme utilization efficiency. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a alcohol dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Alcohol dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Alcohol Dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Alcohol Oxidoreductases |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Article |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Carbon |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Carbon dioxide |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a catalysis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Catalysis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a chemical model |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a chemistry |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a coenzyme |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Coenzymes |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a cofactors |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Cofactors |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a computer simulation |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Computer Simulation |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a controlled study |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a D-xylose dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Efficiency |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Enzymatic conversions |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a enzyme activation |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Enzyme Activation |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a enzyme catalysis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Enzyme catalysis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a enzyme kinetics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Enzyme kinetics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a enzyme specificity |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Enzymes |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a formaldehyde |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Formaldehyde |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Glucose |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Glucose 1-Dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a glucose dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Glucose dehydrogenase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a isolation and purification |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a kinetics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Kinetics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a mathematical model |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a methanol |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Methanol |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Models, Chemical |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a nonhuman |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Nucleotides |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Optimization |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a oxidation reduction reaction |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Oxidation-Reduction |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a oxidoreductase |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a process optimization |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Reaction kinetics |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a reaction optimization |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Reaction optimization |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Recycling |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Redox reactions |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Reduced pyridine nucleotides |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a reduction (chemistry) |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a regeneration |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Regeneration |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a Substrate Specificity |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a synthesis |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a turnover number |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a unclassified drug |
650 | 0 | 4 | |a xylose dehydrogenase |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Marpani, F. |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Meyer, A.S. |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Pinelo, M. |e author |
700 | 1 | 0 | |a Sárossy, Z. |e author |
773 | |t Biotechnology and Bioengineering |x 00063592 (ISSN) |g 114 12, 2762-2770 | ||
856 | |z View Fulltext in Publisher |u https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.26405 | ||
856 | |z View in Scopus |u https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85029300553&doi=10.1002%2fbit.26405&partnerID=40&md5=b5e9ba12fef54328c96127442b9c8d54 |