|
|
|
|
LEADER |
04650nam a2201069Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1002-hbm.25321 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 10659471 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Machine learning-based multimodal prediction of language outcomes in chronic aphasia
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b John Wiley and Sons Inc
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.25321
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Recent studies have combined multiple neuroimaging modalities to gain further understanding of the neurobiological substrates of aphasia. Following this line of work, the current study uses machine learning approaches to predict aphasia severity and specific language measures based on a multimodal neuroimaging dataset. A total of 116 individuals with chronic left-hemisphere stroke were included in the study. Neuroimaging data included task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), diffusion-based fractional anisotropy (FA)-values, cerebral blood flow (CBF), and lesion-load data. The Western Aphasia Battery was used to measure aphasia severity and specific language functions. As a primary analysis, we constructed support vector regression (SVR) models predicting language measures based on (i) each neuroimaging modality separately, (ii) lesion volume alone, and (iii) a combination of all modalities. Prediction accuracy across models was subsequently statistically compared. Prediction accuracy across modalities and language measures varied substantially (predicted vs. empirical correlation range: r =.00–.67). The multimodal prediction model yielded the most accurate prediction in all cases (r =.53–.67). Statistical superiority in favor of the multimodal model was achieved in 28/30 model comparisons (p-value range: <.001–.046). Our results indicate that different neuroimaging modalities carry complementary information that can be integrated to more accurately depict how brain damage and remaining functionality of intact brain tissue translate into language function in aphasia. © 2020 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Adult
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a aged
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Aged
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Aged, 80 and over
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a aphasia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a aphasia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a aphasia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Aphasia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a brain blood flow
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a brain circulation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a brain hemorrhage
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a CBF
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a cerebrovascular accident
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Cerebrovascular Circulation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a chronic aphasia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a chronic disease
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Chronic Disease
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a complication
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a data accuracy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a diffusion tensor imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Diffusion Tensor Imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a disease severity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a FA
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Female
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fMRI
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a fractional anisotropy
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a functional magnetic resonance imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a functional neuroimaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Functional Neuroimaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Humans
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a ischemic stroke
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a language processing
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a language test
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Language Tests
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a left hemisphere
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a lesion
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a machine learning
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a major clinical study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Male
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a middle aged
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Middle Aged
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a multimodal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a multimodal imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Multimodal Imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a neuroimaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a neuroimaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Neuroimaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Outcome Assessment, Health Care
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pathology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a pathophysiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a physiology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a priority journal
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a severity of illness index
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Severity of Illness Index
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Stroke
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a support vector machine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a support vector machine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Support Vector Machine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a very elderly
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Western aphasia battery
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Basilakos, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Bonilha, L.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Fridriksson, J.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Hillis, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kristinsson, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Newman-Norlund, R.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rorden, C.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Xiao, F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Yourganov, G.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Zhang, W.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Human Brain Mapping
|