Corporate venture capital as a real option in the markets for technology

Research Summary: We apply real options (RO) theory to understand the role of corporate venture capital (CVC) investments and its relationship with internal R&D capabilities in supporting the acquisition of external technologies. We formulate hypotheses about key drivers of the option value of C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ceccagnoli, M. (Author), Higgins, M.J (Author), Kang, H.D (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: John Wiley and Sons Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02912nam a2200373Ia 4500
001 10.1002-smj.2950
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 01432095 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Corporate venture capital as a real option in the markets for technology 
260 0 |b John Wiley and Sons Ltd  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2950 
520 3 |a Research Summary: We apply real options (RO) theory to understand the role of corporate venture capital (CVC) investments and its relationship with internal R&D capabilities in supporting the acquisition of external technologies. We formulate hypotheses about key drivers of the option value of CVC and the decision to exercise the RO using a dyadic dataset of global pharmaceutical firms and their biotech partners. Our findings suggest that the option value of CVC is higher for investors with weaker scientific capabilities; engaging the markets for technology in distant technological fields; and, when their innovation pipeline is tilted toward the late-stage development process. Finally, the licensing of high-value technologies is the most likely form of option exercise when technological uncertainty is reduced post-CVC. Managerial Summary: Despite the fact that one of the main goals of corporate venture capital (CVC) investments in high-tech industries is to gain a window on future technologies, the relationship between CVC and other strategies used to acquire external technologies, such as licensing, has not been adequately explored. To address this gap, we formulate hypotheses about key drivers of the decision to make CVC investments as a wait-and-see strategy in the markets for technology (MFT) using a longitudinal dataset of global pharmaceutical firms and their biotech partners. We find that investors' scientific capabilities, technological domains, and research pipelines impact investors' decisions to make CVC investments prior to other MFT transactions. In our research setting, investors typically acquire high-value technologies via licensing when technological uncertainty is reduced post-CVC. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 
650 0 4 |a absorptive capacity 
650 0 4 |a Absorptive capacity 
650 0 4 |a Biotechnology 
650 0 4 |a Commerce 
650 0 4 |a corporate venture capital 
650 0 4 |a Corporate venture capital 
650 0 4 |a Development process 
650 0 4 |a Future technologies 
650 0 4 |a Investments 
650 0 4 |a markets for technology 
650 0 4 |a Markets for technology 
650 0 4 |a Mergers and acquisitions 
650 0 4 |a Pharmaceutical firms 
650 0 4 |a Pipelines 
650 0 4 |a product pipeline 
650 0 4 |a real options 
650 0 4 |a Real Options 
650 0 4 |a Technological uncertainty 
700 1 |a Ceccagnoli, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Higgins, M.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kang, H.D.  |e author 
773 |t Strategic Management Journal