SNAP and Paycheck Cycles

It is well documented that individuals do not spend the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits smoothly over the month after receipt. Rather, recipients spend a disproportionate share of benefits at the beginning of the benefit month. This has costs for recipients and stores. Ther...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beatty, T.K.M (Author), Bitler, M.P (Author), Cheng, X.H (Author), van der Werf, C. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley Blackwell 2019
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01571nam a2200169Ia 4500
001 10.1002-soej.12345
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00384038 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a SNAP and Paycheck Cycles 
260 0 |b Wiley Blackwell  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.12345 
520 3 |a It is well documented that individuals do not spend the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits smoothly over the month after receipt. Rather, recipients spend a disproportionate share of benefits at the beginning of the benefit month. This has costs for recipients and stores. There is also evidence that other income streams, such as Social Security and paychecks, are not spent smoothly. The presence of these other income streams may bias estimates of the effects of this SNAP cycle on consumption for working SNAP beneficiaries and those who receive other government benefits. We use data from United States Department of Agriculture's National Household Food Acquisition and Purchase Survey to explore how the SNAP cycle is affected by accounting for these other income streams. We find suggestive evidence that the cycle is more pronounced for workers who are paid on a weekly or monthly basis, but little evidence that cycles in other income streams mitigate or exacerbate the SNAP cycle. © 2019 by the Southern Economic Association 
700 1 |a Beatty, T.K.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Bitler, M.P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Cheng, X.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a van der Werf, C.  |e author 
773 |t Southern Economic Journal