AI, agency and responsibility: the VW fraud case and beyond

The concept of agency as applied to technological artifacts has become an object of heated debate in the context of AI research because some AI researchers ascribe to programs the type of agency traditionally associated with humans. Confusion about agency is at the root of misconceptions about the p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Johnson, D.G (Author), Verdicchio, M. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer London 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
Description
Summary:The concept of agency as applied to technological artifacts has become an object of heated debate in the context of AI research because some AI researchers ascribe to programs the type of agency traditionally associated with humans. Confusion about agency is at the root of misconceptions about the possibilities for future AI. We introduce the concept of a triadic agency that includes the causal agency of artifacts and the intentional agency of humans to better describe what happens in AI as it functions in real-world contexts. We use the VW emission fraud case to explain triadic agency since in this case a technological artifact, namely software, was an essential part of the wrongdoing and the software might be said to have agency in the wrongdoing. We then extend the case to include futuristic AI, imagining AI that becomes more and more autonomous. © 2018, The Author(s).
ISBN:09515666 (ISSN)
DOI:10.1007/s00146-017-0781-9