Strength of Implementation Intentions to Use Condoms Among Men Who Have Sex with Men

Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is increasing among men who have sex with men (MSM), condoms remain key to HIV prevention. Implementation intentions—which link a behavioral action plan with a situation or cue—may predict condom use. The Strength of Implementation Intentions Scale (SIIS)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nydegger, L.A (Author), Walsh, J.L (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer New York LLC 2018
Subjects:
HIV
MSM
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03112nam a2200733Ia 4500
001 10.1007-s10461-018-2079-4
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10907165 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Strength of Implementation Intentions to Use Condoms Among Men Who Have Sex with Men 
260 0 |b Springer New York LLC  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2079-4 
520 3 |a Although pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is increasing among men who have sex with men (MSM), condoms remain key to HIV prevention. Implementation intentions—which link a behavioral action plan with a situation or cue—may predict condom use. The Strength of Implementation Intentions Scale (SIIS), which assesses condom use implementation intentions, has not been evaluated among MSM. A structural model tested whether the SIIS mediated the relationship between condom use intentions and condomless sex acts among 266 sexually-active MSM (56% White, 26% Black, 15% Latino, Mage = 32.54). After controlling for PrEP use, HIV-status, and demographics (χ2(107) = 140.06, CFI = 0.98, TLI = 0.97, RMSEA = 0.03), the SIIS fully mediated the relationship between condom use intentions and condomless sex acts. The SIIS can serve as a fidelity check for interventions, a mediator in theoretical models, and future studies should incorporate implementation intentions into HIV prevention interventions for MSM. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature. 
650 0 4 |a acquired immune deficiency syndrome 
650 0 4 |a Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a article 
650 0 4 |a behavior 
650 0 4 |a coitus 
650 0 4 |a Coitus 
650 0 4 |a condom 
650 0 4 |a condom use 
650 0 4 |a Condom use 
650 0 4 |a Condoms 
650 0 4 |a Contraception Behavior 
650 0 4 |a contraceptive behavior 
650 0 4 |a Hispanic 
650 0 4 |a HIV 
650 0 4 |a HIV Infections 
650 0 4 |a Homosexuality, Male 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus 
650 0 4 |a Human immunodeficiency virus infection 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Implementation intentions 
650 0 4 |a Intention 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a male homosexuality 
650 0 4 |a mediator 
650 0 4 |a men who have sex with men 
650 0 4 |a MSM 
650 0 4 |a nonhuman 
650 0 4 |a pre-exposure prophylaxis 
650 0 4 |a Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis 
650 0 4 |a PrEP 
650 0 4 |a psychology 
650 0 4 |a safe sex 
650 0 4 |a Safe Sex 
650 0 4 |a Sexual and Gender Minorities 
650 0 4 |a sexual and gender minority 
650 0 4 |a statistics and numerical data 
650 0 4 |a structural model 
650 0 4 |a theoretical study 
650 0 4 |a utilization 
650 0 4 |a young adult 
650 0 4 |a Young Adult 
700 1 |a Nydegger, L.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Walsh, J.L.  |e author 
773 |t AIDS and Behavior