|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02020nam a2200217Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1007-s11097-020-09700-3 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 15687759 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Saying no (to a story): personal identity and negativity
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Springer Science and Business Media B.V.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09700-3
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The concept of narrativity and narrative identity has two birth certificates: it is linked to the phenomenological tradition—beginning with Arendt’s “political phenomenology” —and to the tradition of German Idealism gradually slipping into existentialism. In this article, the author focuses on the latter tradition that helped to pave the way of the concept of narrative self. Key among the thinkers of Classical German Idealism has been Hegel, often considered the philosophical storyteller. Yet the author argues that Hegel’s concept of narrativity is not exclusively applied to the self and has hardly any role in the constitution of consciousness. This is the reason why Hegel (rather than thinkers who place the core of personal identity into narrativity) has the means to formulate a more convincing concept of the self and personal identity. The author does not deny that narrativity is seminal, both for leading a life as a human being and as a concrete person; however, originally consciousness and self-hood are born out of negativity. One enacts one’s selfhood, once one realizes that one has to interrupt narrativity, step in, refuse to live by it, or just ordinarily rephrase it consciously and by this appropriate it. © 2021, Charles University under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a G. W. F. Hegel
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Narrative identity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Narrativity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Negativity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a P. Ricœur
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Personal identity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Promise
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Matějčková, T.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences
|