|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
01513nam a2200229Ia 4500 |
| 001 |
10.1007-s11115-016-0343-5 |
| 008 |
220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d |
| 020 |
|
|
|a 15667170 (ISSN)
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a The Politics of ‘Social Accountability’ in England and Germany: Democratic Control and Moral Imperatives
|
| 260 |
|
0 |
|b Springer New York LLC
|c 2018
|
| 856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-016-0343-5
|
| 520 |
3 |
|
|a This article investigates how politicians in England and Germany approach social accountability during the introduction of markets in the national health care systems. It analyses the discourse among members of parliament during the law making process of the 2012 NHS Health Care Act in England and the 2011 Act for Financing of Statutory Health Insurance in Germany. Generally, the new social accountability reform agenda is attractive to policy makers as it foregrounds public engagement and bottom-up participation (Peters 2001). Social accountability refers to institutional practices that favour participatory and horizontal mechanisms that depart from traditional hierarchical Principal-Agent forms. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Bottom-up
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Democratic accountability
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Ethics
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Health care reforms
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Markets
|
| 650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Social accountability
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Feiler, T.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Mattei, P.
|e author
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a Mitra, M.
|e author
|
| 773 |
|
|
|t Public Organization Review
|
