Speak no ill of the dead: the dead as a social group

In her recent article “The Ontology of Social Groups”, Thomasson (Synthese 196:4829–4845, 2019) argues that social groups can be characterized in terms of the norms that surround them. We show that according to Thomasson’s normativity-based criterion, the dead constitute a social group, since there...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Calosi, D. (Author), Kaspers, T. (Author), Kobe, Y. (Author), LiBrizzi, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Springer Science and Business Media B.V. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02131nam a2200217Ia 4500
001 10.1007-s11229-022-03512-5
008 220517s2022 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00397857 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Speak no ill of the dead: the dead as a social group 
260 0 |b Springer Science and Business Media B.V.  |c 2022 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03512-5 
520 3 |a In her recent article “The Ontology of Social Groups”, Thomasson (Synthese 196:4829–4845, 2019) argues that social groups can be characterized in terms of the norms that surround them. We show that according to Thomasson’s normativity-based criterion, the dead constitute a social group, since there are widespread and well-defined social norms as to how to treat the dead, such as the norm expressed in the title (“Speak no ill of the dead”). We argue that the example of the dead must not be interpreted as a counterexample to this criterion, and that, rather, there are good reasons to think of the dead as a genuine social group. Furthermore, the dead as a social group exist, regardless of whether or not the dead (i.e. the members of this social group) exist as persons. This view is clearly incompatible with the idea that social groups can be explained by citing features of their members, which is why we take the case of the dead to pose a challenge for the thesis of individualism. We consider the ontological implications of this example and suggest that social groups ought to be seen as reifications of social norms. Another implication of taking the dead to be a social group is that the presence of external norms is sufficient for the existence of a social group, and therefore internal norms are not necessary. We defend this implication against some potential theoretical and moral problems. © 2022, The Author(s). 
650 0 4 |a Normativity 
650 0 4 |a Social groups 
650 0 4 |a Social ontology 
650 0 4 |a The philosophy of the dead 
700 1 |a Calosi, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kaspers, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kobe, Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a LiBrizzi, J.  |e author 
773 |t Synthese