Effectiveness of catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination on incident cervical neoplasia in a US health-care setting: a population-based case-control study

Background: The population effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) catch-up vaccination, defined in the USA as first vaccination at ages 13–26 years, has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or canc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregorich, S.E (Author), Huchko, M.J (Author), Kulasingam, S. (Author), Kuppermann, M. (Author), Lam, J.O (Author), Leyden, W.A (Author), Sawaya, G.F (Author), Silverberg, M.J (Author), Smith-McCune, K.K (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2018
Subjects:
age
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 05009nam a2200769Ia 4500
001 10.1016-S2352-4642-18-30220-7
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 23524642 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Effectiveness of catch-up human papillomavirus vaccination on incident cervical neoplasia in a US health-care setting: a population-based case-control study 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30220-7 
520 3 |a Background: The population effectiveness of human papillomavirus (HPV) catch-up vaccination, defined in the USA as first vaccination at ages 13–26 years, has not been studied extensively. We aimed to assess the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2, CIN3, adenocarcinoma in situ, or cancer (CIN2+ and CIN3+) by prior HPV vaccination status, age at first dose, and number of doses in women participating in a screening programme within a large integrated health-care system. Methods: We performed a nested case-control study of women enrolled in Kaiser Permanente Northern California (an integrated health-care delivery system in California, USA). Cases were women with CIN2+ or CIN3+ confirmed by histology between Jan 1, 1995, and June 30, 2014, and incidence density-selected controls were age-matched women without CIN2+ or CIN3+ at the time each case occurred. For each case, we randomly selected five controls. Cases and controls were aged 26 years or younger when the HPV quadrivalent vaccine became available in 2006. Rate ratios (RRs) from conditional logistic regression were estimated by age at time of first HPV quadrivalent vaccine dose (14–17 years, 18–20 years, and ≥21 years), and number of doses (one, two, and three or more doses) compared with no prior vaccination, with adjustment for smoking, hormonal contraceptive prescription, race or ethnicity, sexually transmitted infections, immunosuppression, parity, and number of outpatient visits. Findings: 4357 incident CIN2+ cases and 21 773 matched controls were included in the study. Of these, 1849 were incident CIN3+ cases with 9242 matched controls. The youngest age at time of first vaccination was 14 years. One or more HPV vaccine doses conferred protection against CIN2+ (RR 0·82, 95% CI 0·73–0·93) and CIN3+ (0·77, 0·64–0·94). We found the strongest protection against CIN2+ in women who had received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14–17 years (0·52, 0·36–0·74) or aged 18–20 years (0·65, 0·49–0·88). No significant protection was found in women aged 21 years or older at time of first dose (0·94, 0·81–1·09). Inferences were similar for CIN3+, but with stronger effects for women who received at least three vaccine doses and had received their first dose aged 14–17 years (0·27, 0·13–0·56) or aged 18–20 years (0·59, 0·36–0·97). Interpretation: Catch-up quadrivalent HPV vaccination with three doses was effective against CIN2+ and CIN3+ in girls and women aged 14–20 years at time of first vaccine dose but not for women aged 21 years and older at first dose. Funding: US National Cancer Institute. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd 
650 0 4 |a adenocarcinoma in situ 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a age 
650 0 4 |a Age Factors 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a cancer prevention 
650 0 4 |a cancer risk 
650 0 4 |a case control study 
650 0 4 |a Case-Control Studies 
650 0 4 |a Caucasian 
650 0 4 |a contraceptive behavior 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a drug dose regimen 
650 0 4 |a drug efficacy 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a follow up 
650 0 4 |a groups by age 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a immunization 
650 0 4 |a Immunization Schedule 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a observational study 
650 0 4 |a outpatient care 
650 0 4 |a papillomavirus infection 
650 0 4 |a Papillomavirus Infections 
650 0 4 |a Papillomavirus Vaccines 
650 0 4 |a risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a sexually transmitted disease 
650 0 4 |a smoking 
650 0 4 |a treatment outcome 
650 0 4 |a Treatment Outcome 
650 0 4 |a United States 
650 0 4 |a Uterine Cervical Neoplasms 
650 0 4 |a uterine cervix carcinoma 
650 0 4 |a uterine cervix carcinoma in situ 
650 0 4 |a uterine cervix tumor 
650 0 4 |a vaccination 
650 0 4 |a Wart virus vaccine 
650 0 4 |a young adult 
650 0 4 |a Young Adult 
700 1 |a Gregorich, S.E.  |e author 
700 1 |a Huchko, M.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kulasingam, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kuppermann, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Lam, J.O.  |e author 
700 1 |a Leyden, W.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sawaya, G.F.  |e author 
700 1 |a Silverberg, M.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Smith-McCune, K.K.  |e author 
773 |t The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health