Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand

Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Athamneh, L.N (Author), Bickel, W.K (Author), Epstein, L.H (Author), Mellis, A.M (Author), Stein, J.S (Author), Sze, Y.Y (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academic Press 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03251nam a2200661Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.appet.2018.06.032
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 01956663 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Less is more: Negative income shock increases immediate preference in cross commodity discounting and food demand 
260 0 |b Academic Press  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2018.06.032 
520 3 |a Negative income shock, or the rapid reduction in financial stability, has previously been shown to increase impulsive choice for money and demand for fast food. The interplay of these conditions for obesity is called reinforcer pathology. The present work examines the impact of negative income shock on monetary and fast food discounting using a cross-commodity delay discounting task and on purchasing of fast food and an alternative commodity. An obese sample (n = 120) was recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk and assigned to read one of two narratives: negative income shock (n = 60) or control (n = 60). Participants then completed both within- and cross-commodity discounting tasks of money and food, and purchase tasks for fast food and bottled water. The negative income shock group demonstrated greater impulsive choice across discounting tasks, as well as higher intensity of demand for fast food but not for a non-caloric control commodity (bottled water). These results suggest that negative income shock increases preference for immediate reinforcement regardless of commodity type (money or fast food), but has specific effects increasing demand for particular commodities (fast food but not an alternative). In a reinforcer pathology framework, negative income shock increasing discounting of the future while increasing demand for fast food specifically represents a high-risk state for negative health behavior in obesity. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a Choice Behavior 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a cost of living 
650 0 4 |a Cross-commodity 
650 0 4 |a decision making 
650 0 4 |a delay discounting 
650 0 4 |a Delay discounting 
650 0 4 |a Delay Discounting 
650 0 4 |a Demand 
650 0 4 |a fast food 
650 0 4 |a Fast food 
650 0 4 |a Fast Foods 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a food craving 
650 0 4 |a health behavior 
650 0 4 |a health status 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Impulsive Behavior 
650 0 4 |a impulsiveness 
650 0 4 |a income 
650 0 4 |a Income 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a mental stress 
650 0 4 |a Negative income shock 
650 0 4 |a obesity 
650 0 4 |a Obesity 
650 0 4 |a purchasing 
650 0 4 |a reinforcement 
650 0 4 |a shock 
650 0 4 |a Stress, Psychological 
650 0 4 |a task performance 
650 0 4 |a Three-Factor-Eating-Questionnaire 
700 1 |a Athamneh, L.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Bickel, W.K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Epstein, L.H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mellis, A.M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Stein, J.S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Sze, Y.Y.  |e author 
773 |t Appetite