Effects of formant proximity and stimulus prototypicality on the neural discrimination of vowels: Evidence from the auditory frequency-following response

Cross-language speech perception experiments indicate that for many vowel contrasts, discrimination is easier when the same pair of vowels is presented in one direction compared to the reverse direction. According to one account, these directional asymmetries reflect a universal bias favoring “focal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kuhl, P.K (Author), Masapollo, M. (Author), Ménard, L. (Author), Polka, L. (Author), Zhao, T.C (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academic Press Inc. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02957nam a2200613Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.bandl.2019.05.002
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0093934X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Effects of formant proximity and stimulus prototypicality on the neural discrimination of vowels: Evidence from the auditory frequency-following response 
260 0 |b Academic Press Inc.  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2019.05.002 
520 3 |a Cross-language speech perception experiments indicate that for many vowel contrasts, discrimination is easier when the same pair of vowels is presented in one direction compared to the reverse direction. According to one account, these directional asymmetries reflect a universal bias favoring “focal” vowels (i.e., vowels with prominent spectral peaks formed by the convergence of adjacent formants). An alternative account is that such effects reflect an experience-dependent bias favoring prototypical exemplars of native-language vowel categories. Here, we tested the predictions of these accounts by recording the auditory frequency-following response in English-speaking listeners to two synthetic variants of the vowel /u/ that differed in the proximity of their first and second formants and prototypicality, with stimuli arranged in oddball and reversed-oddball blocks. Participants showed evidence of neural discrimination when the more-focal/less-prototypic /u/ served as the deviant stimulus, but not when the less-focal/more-prototypic /u/ served as the deviant, consistent with the focalization account. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a auditory discrimination 
650 0 4 |a Auditory frequency-following response 
650 0 4 |a auditory response 
650 0 4 |a auditory stimulation 
650 0 4 |a Discrimination (Psychology) 
650 0 4 |a English (language) 
650 0 4 |a experimental study 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a Focal vowels 
650 0 4 |a frequency modulation 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a human experiment 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a language processing 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a multilingualism 
650 0 4 |a Multilingualism 
650 0 4 |a Native Language Magnet model 
650 0 4 |a Natural Referent Vowel framework 
650 0 4 |a neurobiology 
650 0 4 |a normal human 
650 0 4 |a perceptive discrimination 
650 0 4 |a phonetics 
650 0 4 |a Phonetics 
650 0 4 |a prediction 
650 0 4 |a speech 
650 0 4 |a Speech Acoustics 
650 0 4 |a speech perception 
650 0 4 |a Speech perception 
650 0 4 |a Speech Perception 
650 0 4 |a vowel 
700 1 |a Kuhl, P.K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Masapollo, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ménard, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Polka, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Zhao, T.C.  |e author 
773 |t Brain and Language