Sign language experience redistributes attentional resources to the inferior visual field

• Main Authors: Dye, M.W.G (Author), Stoll, C. (Author)
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V. 2019
• Subjects: adult; Adult; Article; attention; Attention; bilateral hearing loss; Deaf; Deafness; decision making; depth perception; hearing impairment; human; Humans; language; Lateralization; Neuroplasticity; pathophysiology; physiology; priority journal; Prospective Studies; prospective study; reaction time; sign language; Sign language; Sign Language; Space Perception; Vertical asymmetry; vision; visual attention; Visual attention; visual field; Visual Fields; Visual Perception; visual system
• Online Access: View Fulltext in Publisher

 While a substantial body of work has suggested that deafness brings about an increased allocation of visual attention to the periphery there has been much less work on how using a signed language may also influence this attentional allocation. Signed languages are visual-gestural and produced using the body and perceived via the human visual system. Signers fixate upon the face of interlocutors and do not directly look at the hands moving in the inferior visual field. It is therefore reasonable to predict that signed languages require a redistribution of covert visual attention to the inferior visual field. Here we report a prospective and statistically powered assessment of the spatial distribution of attention to inferior and superior visual fields in signers – both deaf and hearing – in a visual search task. Using a Bayesian Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Model, we estimated decision making parameters for the superior and inferior visual field in deaf signers, hearing signers and hearing non-signers. Results indicated a greater attentional redistribution toward the inferior visual field in adult signers (both deaf and hearing) than in hearing sign-naïve adults. The effect was smaller for hearing signers than for deaf signers, suggestive of either a role for extent of exposure or greater plasticity of the visual system in the deaf. The data provide support for a process by which the demands of linguistic processing can influence the human attentional system. © 2019