The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: A simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study

There is an apparent disparity between the fields of cognitive audiology and cognitive electrophysiology as to how linguistic context is used when listening to perceptually challenging speech. To gain a clearer picture of how listening effort impacts context use, we conducted a pre-registered study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Payne, B.R (Author), Silcox, J.W (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Masson SpA 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03600nam a2200577Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.cortex.2021.06.007
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00109452 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The costs (and benefits) of effortful listening on context processing: A simultaneous electrophysiology, pupillometry, and behavioral study 
260 0 |b Masson SpA  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.06.007 
520 3 |a There is an apparent disparity between the fields of cognitive audiology and cognitive electrophysiology as to how linguistic context is used when listening to perceptually challenging speech. To gain a clearer picture of how listening effort impacts context use, we conducted a pre-registered study to simultaneously examine electrophysiological, pupillometric, and behavioral responses when listening to sentences varying in contextual constraint and acoustic challenge in the same sample. Participants (N = 44) listened to sentences that were highly constraining and completed with expected or unexpected sentence-final words (“The prisoners were planning their escape/party”) or were low-constraint sentences with unexpected sentence-final words (“All day she thought about the party”). Sentences were presented either in quiet or with +3 dB SNR background noise. Pupillometry and EEG were simultaneously recorded and subsequent sentence recognition and word recall were measured. While the N400 expectancy effect was diminished by noise, suggesting impaired real-time context use, we simultaneously observed a beneficial effect of constraint on subsequent recognition memory for degraded speech. Importantly, analyses of trial-to-trial coupling between pupil dilation and N400 amplitude showed that when participants’ showed increased listening effort (i.e., greater pupil dilation), there was a subsequent recovery of the N400 effect, but at the same time, higher effort was related to poorer subsequent sentence recognition and word recall. Collectively, these findings suggest divergent effects of acoustic challenge and listening effort on context use: while noise impairs the rapid use of context to facilitate lexical semantic processing in general, this negative effect is attenuated when listeners show increased effort in response to noise. However, this effort-induced reliance on context for online word processing comes at the cost of poorer subsequent memory. © 2021 Elsevier Ltd 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a behavior assessment 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a cost benefit analysis 
650 0 4 |a electroencephalogram 
650 0 4 |a electroencephalography 
650 0 4 |a Electroencephalography 
650 0 4 |a electrophysiology 
650 0 4 |a Electrophysiology 
650 0 4 |a Evoked Potentials 
650 0 4 |a evoked response 
650 0 4 |a executive function 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Linguistic context 
650 0 4 |a Listening effort 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a memory 
650 0 4 |a Memory 
650 0 4 |a mydriasis 
650 0 4 |a N400 
650 0 4 |a noise 
650 0 4 |a Noise 
650 0 4 |a pupillometry 
650 0 4 |a Pupillometry 
650 0 4 |a recognition 
650 0 4 |a semantics 
650 0 4 |a Single-trial analysis 
650 0 4 |a speech 
650 0 4 |a speech perception 
650 0 4 |a Speech Perception 
650 0 4 |a word recognition 
700 1 |a Payne, B.R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Silcox, J.W.  |e author 
773 |t Cortex