Neurocognitive factorial structure of executive functions: Evidence from neurotypicals and frontotemporal dementia

The latent structure of executive functions (EFs) remains controversial. Confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) has provided support for both multidimensional (assumes EFs to be functionally separable but related components) and bifactor (proposes all components are nested within a common factor) mod...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fittipaldi, S. (Author), Gonzalez-Gomez, R. (Author), Huepe, D. (Author), Ibáñez, A. (Author), Rodríguez-Villagra, O.A (Author), Schulte, M. (Author), Torralva, T. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Masson SpA 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 04551nam a2200889Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.cortex.2021.08.015
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00109452 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Neurocognitive factorial structure of executive functions: Evidence from neurotypicals and frontotemporal dementia 
260 0 |b Masson SpA  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2021.08.015 
520 3 |a The latent structure of executive functions (EFs) remains controversial. Confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) has provided support for both multidimensional (assumes EFs to be functionally separable but related components) and bifactor (proposes all components are nested within a common factor) models. However, these CFA models have never been compared in patient samples, nor regarding their neuroanatomical correlates. Here, we systematically contrast both approaches in neurotypicals and in a neurodegenerative lesion model (patients with the behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, bvFTD), characterized by executive deficits associated with frontal neurodegeneration. First, CFA was used to test the models' fit in a sample of 341 neurotypicals and 29 bvFTD patients based on performance in an executive frontal screening battery which assesses working memory, motor inhibition, verbal inhibition, and abstraction capacity. Second, we compared EFs factor and observed scores between patients and matched controls. Finally, we used voxel-based morphometry (VBM) to compare the grey matter correlates of factor and observed scores. CFA results showed that both models fit the data well. The multidimensional model, however, was more sensitive than the bifactor model and the observed scores to detect EFs impairments in bvFTD patients. VBM results for the multidimensional model revealed common and unique grey matter correlates for EFs components across prefrontal-insular, posterior, and temporal cortices. Regarding the bifactor model, only the common factor was associated with prefrontal-insular hubs. Observed scores presented scant, non-frontal grey matter associations. Converging behavioral and neuroanatomical evidence from healthy populations and a neurodegenerative model of EFs supports an underlying multidimensional structure. © 2021 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a abstract thinking 
650 0 4 |a Addenbrooke cognitive examination III 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a aged 
650 0 4 |a amygdala 
650 0 4 |a anterior insula 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a backwards digit span 
650 0 4 |a brain 
650 0 4 |a Brain 
650 0 4 |a brain mapping 
650 0 4 |a brain size 
650 0 4 |a bvFTD 
650 0 4 |a clinical assessment 
650 0 4 |a Clinical Dementia Rating 
650 0 4 |a clinical evaluation 
650 0 4 |a cognition 
650 0 4 |a cognitive defect 
650 0 4 |a comparative study 
650 0 4 |a confirmatory factor analysis 
650 0 4 |a Confirmatory factorial analysis 
650 0 4 |a controlled study 
650 0 4 |a executive function 
650 0 4 |a executive function 
650 0 4 |a Executive Function 
650 0 4 |a Executive functions 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a frontal variant frontotemporal dementia 
650 0 4 |a frontotemporal dementia 
650 0 4 |a Frontotemporal Dementia 
650 0 4 |a Go No Go task 
650 0 4 |a gray matter 
650 0 4 |a hayling test 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Lesion model 
650 0 4 |a Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
650 0 4 |a major clinical study 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a nerve degeneration 
650 0 4 |a neuroanatomy 
650 0 4 |a neuropsychological test 
650 0 4 |a Neuropsychological Tests 
650 0 4 |a neurotypical frontotemporal dementia 
650 0 4 |a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging 
650 0 4 |a orbital cortex 
650 0 4 |a posterior cingulate 
650 0 4 |a proverb interpretation task 
650 0 4 |a spatial working memory 
650 0 4 |a task performance 
650 0 4 |a trail making test 
650 0 4 |a verbal working memory 
650 0 4 |a very elderly 
650 0 4 |a voxel based morphometry 
650 0 4 |a Voxel-based morphometry 
650 0 4 |a Wisconsin Card Sorting Test 
650 0 4 |a working memory 
700 1 |a Fittipaldi, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Gonzalez-Gomez, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Huepe, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Ibáñez, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Rodríguez-Villagra, O.A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Schulte, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Torralva, T.  |e author 
773 |t Cortex