Comparative evaluation of geospatial scenario-based land change simulation models using landscape metrics

Assessing the performance of land change simulation models is a critical step when predicting the future landscape scenario. The study was conducted in the district of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India because the city being “the oldest living city in the world” attracts a vast population to reside her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Arora, A. (Author), Costache, R. (Author), Di, L. (Author), Kumar, R. (Author), Mishra, V.N (Author), Pandey, M. (Author), Punia, M. (Author), Rai, P.K (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03890nam a2200397Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.ecolind.2021.107810
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 1470160X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Comparative evaluation of geospatial scenario-based land change simulation models using landscape metrics 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107810 
520 3 |a Assessing the performance of land change simulation models is a critical step when predicting the future landscape scenario. The study was conducted in the district of Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India because the city being “the oldest living city in the world” attracts a vast population to reside here for short and long-term, leaving the city's ecosystem more exposed to fragility and less resilient. In this work, an approach based on landscape metrics is introduced for comparing the performance of the ensemble models designed to simulate the landscape changes. A set of landscape metrics were applied in this study that offered comprehensive information on the performance of scenario-based simulation models from the viewpoint of the spatial ordering of simulated results against the related reference maps. A supervised support vector machine classification technique was applied to derive the LULC maps using Landsat satellite images of the year 1988, 2001, and 2015. The LULC maps of 1988 and 2001 were used to simulate the LULC scenario for 2015 using three Markov chain-based simulation models namely, multi-layer perceptron-Markov chain (MLP_Markov), cellular automata-Markov chain (CA_Markov), and stochastic-Markov chain (ST_Markov) respectively. The mean relative error (MRE), as a measure of the success of simulation models, was calculated for metrics. The MRE values at both the class and landscape levels were accounted for 21.63 and 11.45% respectively using MLP_Markov simulation model. The MRE values at both the class and landscape levels were accounted for 39.61 and 28.31% respectively using CA_Markov simulation model. The MRE values at both the class and landscape levels were accounted for 55.36 and 45.75% respectively using ST_Markov simulation model. The MRE values considered at class and landscape levels are further evaluated qualitatively for comparing the performance of simulation models. The results indicate that the MLP_Markov performed excellently, followed by CA_Markov and ST_Markov simulation models. This work showed an ordered and multi-level spatial evaluation of the models’ performance into the decision-making process of selecting the optimum approach among them. Landscape metrics as a vital characteristic of the utilized method, employ the maximum potential of the reference and simulated layers for a performance evaluation process. It extends the insight into the main strengths and drawbacks of a specific model when simulating the spatio-temporal pattern. The quantified information of transition among landscape categories also provides land policy managers a better perception to build a sustainable city master plan. © 2021 The Author(s) 
650 0 4 |a comparative study 
650 0 4 |a India 
650 0 4 |a Land change model 
650 0 4 |a land cover 
650 0 4 |a land use 
650 0 4 |a Land use/ land cover 
650 0 4 |a Landsat 
650 0 4 |a Landscape metrics 
650 0 4 |a Markov chain 
650 0 4 |a simulation 
650 0 4 |a Simulation 
650 0 4 |a spatiotemporal analysis 
650 0 4 |a support vector machine 
650 0 4 |a Uttar Pradesh 
650 0 4 |a Varanasi 
700 1 |a Arora, A.  |e author 
700 1 |a Costache, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Di, L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kumar, R.  |e author 
700 1 |a Mishra, V.N.  |e author 
700 1 |a Pandey, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Punia, M.  |e author 
700 1 |a Rai, P.K.  |e author 
773 |t Ecological Indicators