Impacts of land use change on ecosystem service value based on SDGs report–Taking Guangxi as an example

Ecosystem services provide a variety of benefits for mankind, and their sustainable use plays an important role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study takes Guangxi as the research object and compares multiple intelligent classification algorithms for land cover based on m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hu, B. (Author), Qiu, H. (Author), Zhang, Z. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 03691nam a2200541Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.ecolind.2021.108366
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 1470160X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Impacts of land use change on ecosystem service value based on SDGs report–Taking Guangxi as an example 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108366 
520 3 |a Ecosystem services provide a variety of benefits for mankind, and their sustainable use plays an important role in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This study takes Guangxi as the research object and compares multiple intelligent classification algorithms for land cover based on multi-source data. Selects Random Forest (RF) classification algorithms for land cover classification, analyses their temporal and spatial changes, and the extracted results produce SDG 15.1.1, 15.1.2, 15.1.4 indicators, and assess the degree of completion of Guangxi's SDGs 15.2 indicators. On this basis, the equivalent factor method was used to evaluate the change of ecosystem value caused by land use change, and the direct impact of land use change on SDG15.9 was evaluated. The results indicate that:(1) From 1990 to 2020, forest was the most important land use mode in Guangxi, and the most serious wetland shrinkage was in Beihai and Nanning; The overall trend of land use changes is that wetlands, forests, and grasslands have decreased, dry land and construction land have increased, and bare land has remained basically remained unchanged. (2) From 1990 to 2020, the SDG 15.1.1 indicator showed a slow rise and then a rapid decline. The SDG 15.1.2 indicator showed a continuous downward trend. The SDG 15.1.4 indicator showed a steady upward trend. Guangxi failed to achieve the target of SDG15.2 by 2020. (3) From 1990 to 2020, the overall ecosystem service value in Guangxi showed a decreasing trend, and the one-way ecosystem service value in Guangxi was dominated by hydrological regulation and climate regulation. The ecosystem service value showed a spatial pattern of “low in the central region and high in the surrounding areas.” (4) Grassland to forest and dryland to forest were the main types of ecological service income; Forest conversion to dryland is the most important type of ecological service loss. (5) As a whole, only dryland sensitivity index less than 0 during 2010–2015 had a negative impact on Ecosystem services values (ESV), while other time and land use type sensitivity index were all greater than 0 had a positive impact on ESV. © 2021 
650 0 4 |a Beihai 
650 0 4 |a China 
650 0 4 |a classification 
650 0 4 |a Classification algorithm 
650 0 4 |a Decision trees 
650 0 4 |a Dry land 
650 0 4 |a Ecological services 
650 0 4 |a ecosystem service 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystem service values 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystem services 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystem services 
650 0 4 |a Ecosystems 
650 0 4 |a forest 
650 0 4 |a Forestry 
650 0 4 |a Guangxi 
650 0 4 |a Guangxi 
650 0 4 |a Guangxi Zhuangzu 
650 0 4 |a Guangxi Zhuangzu 
650 0 4 |a Indicator indicator 
650 0 4 |a land cover 
650 0 4 |a Land use 
650 0 4 |a land use change 
650 0 4 |a Land use change 
650 0 4 |a Landuse change 
650 0 4 |a Nanning 
650 0 4 |a SDGs 
650 0 4 |a Sensitivity indices 
650 0 4 |a shrinkage 
650 0 4 |a Sustainable development goal 
650 0 4 |a Value-based 
650 0 4 |a wetland 
650 0 4 |a Wetlands 
700 1 |a Hu, B.  |e author 
700 1 |a Qiu, H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Zhang, Z.  |e author 
773 |t Ecological Indicators