Physical strength predicts political violence

Research has revealed an association between individual physical strength and attitudinal support for modern war. Physical strength of one individual has an infinitesimal effect on the outcomes of state-level aggression involving large-scale armies and complex military technology. The fact that stro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bartusevičius, H. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02445nam a2200205Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.006
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10905138 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Physical strength predicts political violence 
260 0 |b Elsevier Inc.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.03.006 
520 3 |a Research has revealed an association between individual physical strength and attitudinal support for modern war. Physical strength of one individual has an infinitesimal effect on the outcomes of state-level aggression involving large-scale armies and complex military technology. The fact that stronger individuals do support such aggression hints at an evolved psychology specialized for small-scale coalitional aggression, where strength of coalition members non-negligibly contribute to the net coalition strength. Here, I examined whether strength also accounts for participation in modern political aggression, as contrasted to mere support. Given that contemporary political aggression primarily occurs within—not between—states, I focused on intra-state forms of political violence, specifically violent antigovernment protests. To enhance external and ecological validity, I relied on large probability samples from both non-WEIRD and WEIRD countries experiencing political violence (N = 6283; interviewees were quota-sampled from YouGov online panels to generate representative samples of online adult populations). Multinational analyses revealed that self-perceived strength significantly predicts intentions to participate in political violence and self-reported participation, and that this association is stronger among young interviewees, but not among men (compared to women). The predictive power of strength was modest but comparable to that of gender, an established predictor of aggression. I discuss why the fact that strength—a physiological variable—relates to political violence—a complex modern phenomenon—is remarkable. Subsequently, I suggest a new research agenda that draws on insights from evolutionary research to study modern political violence. © 2021 Elsevier Inc. 
650 0 4 |a Coalitional aggression 
650 0 4 |a Formidability 
650 0 4 |a Political violence 
650 0 4 |a Protest 
650 0 4 |a Strength 
650 0 4 |a WEIRD 
700 1 |a Bartusevičius, H.  |e author 
773 |t Evolution and Human Behavior