Risk preferences significantly affect household investment in timber forestry: Empirical evidence from Fujian, China

Implementing another round of massive collective forest tenure reform in China since in 2008 has not materialized the government's expectation on small-scale timber forestry–improved management practices and resource quality. One underlying cause to this outcome is farmer's risk-averse att...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen, Q. (Author), Duan, W. (Author), Hogarth, N.J (Author), Shen, J. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02695nam a2200481Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.forpol.2021.102421
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 13899341 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Risk preferences significantly affect household investment in timber forestry: Empirical evidence from Fujian, China 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102421 
520 3 |a Implementing another round of massive collective forest tenure reform in China since in 2008 has not materialized the government's expectation on small-scale timber forestry–improved management practices and resource quality. One underlying cause to this outcome is farmer's risk-averse attitude, which has thus far garnered little research attention. In this study, we combine the prospect theory and a lottery experiment to measure individual risk preferences on timber forestry investment. Based on a sample of 303 households conducted in 2018 in Fujian, China, we find that the ‘household risk preference’ parameter has a significant negative impact on both the decision to invest in timber forestry and the intensity of investment. Further, the ‘loss aversion’ and ‘probability weighting’ parameters affect household investment intensity negatively. These results indicate that the more risk averse rural households are, the less willing they are to invest in timber forestry, and the lower their investment intensities are. Also, the effect of the risk preferences on cash outlay is larger than on labor cost. These insights have direct implications for better designing tenure reform and other policies to promote smallholder forestry in China and beyond. © 2021 
650 0 4 |a China 
650 0 4 |a Collective forest tenure reform 
650 0 4 |a Double-hurdle model 
650 0 4 |a Forestry 
650 0 4 |a Forestry 
650 0 4 |a Impact 
650 0 4 |a Individual risks 
650 0 4 |a Intensity 
650 0 4 |a Investment 
650 0 4 |a Investments 
650 0 4 |a Management 
650 0 4 |a Management practices 
650 0 4 |a Probability weighting 
650 0 4 |a Prospect theory 
650 0 4 |a Risk analysis 
650 0 4 |a Risk assessment 
650 0 4 |a Risk Assessment 
650 0 4 |a Risk preference 
650 0 4 |a Risk preference 
650 0 4 |a Rural households 
650 0 4 |a Salaries 
650 0 4 |a Smallholder forestries 
650 0 4 |a Timber 
650 0 4 |a Timber forestry investment 
650 0 4 |a Underlying cause 
650 0 4 |a Wages 
700 1 |a Chen, Q.  |e author 
700 1 |a Duan, W.  |e author 
700 1 |a Hogarth, N.J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Shen, J.  |e author 
773 |t Forest Policy and Economics