Do protectionist trade policies integrate domestic markets? Evidence from the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber dispute

We consider the effects of protectionist trade policies on international and domestic market integration, using evidence from the long-standing softwood lumber trade dispute between Canada and the United States. The benefits of trade liberalization are widely acknowledged, including better domestic-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guo, J. (Author), Johnston, C.M.T (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier B.V. 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02887nam a2200445Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.forpol.2021.102525
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 13899341 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Do protectionist trade policies integrate domestic markets? Evidence from the Canada-U.S. softwood lumber dispute 
260 0 |b Elsevier B.V.  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2021.102525 
520 3 |a We consider the effects of protectionist trade policies on international and domestic market integration, using evidence from the long-standing softwood lumber trade dispute between Canada and the United States. The benefits of trade liberalization are widely acknowledged, including better domestic-to-foreign price transmission due to reduced tariffs and lower trade costs between countries. Yet in recent years we see efforts to protect specific domestic groups, including producers, through a revival of protectionist trade policies. Such policies could improve the domestic price transmission across domestic markets as consumers may seek lower-cost alternatives domestically. We investigate these ideas using a bi-variate three-regime threshold vector error-correction model to examine the spatial price transmission between Canadian and U.S. markets and within U.S. domestic markets. We do that by introducing a structural break at the start of an effective free trade period within our sample. The results suggest that duty-free treatment for imported Canadian softwood lumber substantially lowers the transaction costs between the two nations. Prices are more easily transmitted from the Canadian market to the U.S. at a higher speed, but the speed of price transmission in the reverse direction is not statistically significant. The U.S. domestic market experienced a higher speed of price adjustment across domestic regions prior to the free trade period, which provides evidence that protectionist policies lead to better domestic market integration. © 2021 Elsevier B.V. 
650 0 4 |a Commerce 
650 0 4 |a Commerce 
650 0 4 |a Costs 
650 0 4 |a Costs 
650 0 4 |a Domestic markets 
650 0 4 |a Error correction 
650 0 4 |a Free trade 
650 0 4 |a High Speed 
650 0 4 |a High Velocity 
650 0 4 |a Integration 
650 0 4 |a Integration 
650 0 4 |a International topic 
650 0 4 |a International topics 
650 0 4 |a Lumber 
650 0 4 |a Lumber 
650 0 4 |a Market integration 
650 0 4 |a Market structure and pricing 
650 0 4 |a Market structure and pricing 
650 0 4 |a Price transmission 
650 0 4 |a Softwood lumber 
650 0 4 |a Softwoods 
650 0 4 |a Softwoods 
650 0 4 |a Trade integration 
650 0 4 |a Trade integration 
650 0 4 |a Trade policies 
700 1 |a Guo, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Johnston, C.M.T.  |e author 
773 |t Forest Policy and Economics