Unified versus divided enrollment in school choice: Improving student welfare in Chicago

The Chicago Board of Education is implementing a centralized clearinghouse to assign students to schools since 2018-19 admissions. In this clearinghouse, each student can simultaneously be admitted to a selective and a nonselective school. We study this divided enrollment system and show that an alt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Doğan, B. (Author), Yenmez, M.B (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academic Press Inc. 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01483nam a2200181Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.geb.2019.09.010
008 220511s2019 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 08998256 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Unified versus divided enrollment in school choice: Improving student welfare in Chicago 
260 0 |b Academic Press Inc.  |c 2019 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.09.010 
520 3 |a The Chicago Board of Education is implementing a centralized clearinghouse to assign students to schools since 2018-19 admissions. In this clearinghouse, each student can simultaneously be admitted to a selective and a nonselective school. We study this divided enrollment system and show that an alternative unified enrollment system, which elicits the preferences of students over all schools and assigns each student to only one school, is better for students when choice rules of schools are substitutable. If the choice rule of a school is not substitutable, then there exist student preferences such that at least one student strictly prefers the divided enrollment system to the unified enrollment system. Furthermore, we characterize the sources of inefficiency in the divided enrollment system when choice rules of schools are substitutable. © 2019 Elsevier Inc. 
650 0 4 |a Market design 
650 0 4 |a School choice 
650 0 4 |a Unified enrollment 
700 1 |a Doğan, B.  |e author 
700 1 |a Yenmez, M.B.  |e author 
773 |t Games and Economic Behavior