The potential to reduce GHG emissions in egg production using a GHG calculator – A Cool Farm Tool case study

Models and tools are used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture from management processes when measurements are not available. The Cool Farm Tool is widely used by farmers for this purpose. Previously, methods to calculate emissions from crop production have been presented; this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hillier, J. (Author), Malin, D. (Author), Smith, P. (Author), Vetter, S.H (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier Ltd 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02266nam a2200397Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.jclepro.2018.08.199
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 09596526 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a The potential to reduce GHG emissions in egg production using a GHG calculator – A Cool Farm Tool case study 
260 0 |b Elsevier Ltd  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.199 
520 3 |a Models and tools are used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in agriculture from management processes when measurements are not available. The Cool Farm Tool is widely used by farmers for this purpose. Previously, methods to calculate emissions from crop production have been presented; this paper focuses on the livestock part of the tool. GHG emissions from livestock include enteric methane emissions from ruminants, nitrous oxide and methane emissions from manure management, land use and land-use change, feed production, processing and transport. A case study is presented of 10 large-scale egg producers, who used the Cool Farm Tool over three years to calculate their emissions. The highest GHG emissions were produced through feed, followed by transport and manure management. Through using the tool, the farmers became aware of the sources of emissions in egg production and without targets, took action to reduce emissions. The results show that the averaged GHG emissions decreased over the three years of the study by nearly 25%. © 2018 Elsevier Ltd 
650 0 4 |a Agricultural implements 
650 0 4 |a Cool farm tool 
650 0 4 |a Crop production 
650 0 4 |a Cultivation 
650 0 4 |a Egg production 
650 0 4 |a Enteric methane emissions 
650 0 4 |a Fertilizers 
650 0 4 |a Gas emissions 
650 0 4 |a Greenhouse gases 
650 0 4 |a Land use 
650 0 4 |a Land-use change 
650 0 4 |a Mammals 
650 0 4 |a Management process 
650 0 4 |a Manure management 
650 0 4 |a Manures 
650 0 4 |a Methane 
650 0 4 |a Methane emissions 
650 0 4 |a Mitigation 
650 0 4 |a Nitrogen oxides 
700 1 |a Hillier, J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Malin, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Smith, P.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vetter, S.H.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Cleaner Production