|
|
|
|
LEADER |
03119nam a2200469Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1016-j.jece.2022.107587 |
008 |
220510s2022 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 22133437 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a The integration of ZVI-dehalogenation and electrochemical oxidation for the treatment of complex effluents polluted with iodinated compounds
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier Ltd
|c 2022
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107587
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a This work evaluates the integration of dehalogenation with Zero Valent Iron (ZVI) and electrochemical oxidation (EO) for the treatment of urines polluted with iodinated X-ray contrast media (ICM). To do this, different strategies were evaluated: pretreatment with ZVI followed by EO (ZVI-EO) or electrolysis enhanced with ZVI-dehalogenation (EO/ZVI). For comparison purposes, single electrolysis was also performed to check the best treatment strategy. Results showed that EO was less efficient than EO/ZVI and ZVI-EO processes. Removal percentages of 74.9%, 87.6% and 99.5% were reached after passing 13.8 Ah dm−3 at 10 mA cm−2 during EO, EO/ZVI and ZVI-EO, respectively. EO/ZVI process favored the production of large amounts of hydroxyl radicals in the effluent through Fenton´s reaction, enhancing the degradation rate of iopamidol (IPM). The pretreatment with ZVI allowed to transform up to 95% of IPM to C17H25N3O8. Then, electrolysis attained the almost complete removal of the raw pollutant (ZVI-EO). The different iodine species formed at the end of the treatment were also monitored, finding similar proportions of organic iodine species for EO and EO/ZVI processes, although single EO promoted the formation of the stable inorganic iodine (IO3-) and EO/ZVI favored the release of I-. Total organic carbon removal percentages lower than 20% were achieved, suggesting that the technologies employed were selective for the removal of the target pollutant under the operating conditions studied. Finally, the organic IPM by-products were also identified by LC-MS and the chromatographic area profiles showed higher values for EO/ZVI followed by ZVI-EO and EO. © 2022 The Authors
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Degradation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Degradation rate
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Effluents
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electrochemical oxidation
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electrolysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electrolysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hydroxyl radicals
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iodinated X-ray contrast media
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iodine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iodine species
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iopamidol
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iopamidol
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Iron
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Large amounts
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Organic carbon
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Oxidation process
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pollution
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Pre-treatments
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Urine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Urine
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Zero valent iron
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Zero-valent iron
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cañizares, P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Correia, S.E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Cotillas, S.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Lacasa, E.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Moratalla, Á.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rodrigo, M.A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Sáez, C.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
|