A nomogram for classification of temporomandibular joint disk perforation based on magnetic resonance imaging

Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors and establish a prediction model for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk perforation by constructing a nomogram. Study Design: The study included a total of 282 joints in 274 patients. All patients underwent open TMJ surgery after obtaining...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huh, J.-K (Author), Jeon, K.-J (Author), Kim, J.-Y (Author), Kim, M.-G (Author), Park, K.-H (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Mosby Inc. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02794nam a2200457Ia 4500
001 10.1016-j.oooo.2018.02.009
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 22124403 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a A nomogram for classification of temporomandibular joint disk perforation based on magnetic resonance imaging 
260 0 |b Mosby Inc.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2018.02.009 
520 3 |a Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze risk factors and establish a prediction model for temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disk perforation by constructing a nomogram. Study Design: The study included a total of 282 joints in 274 patients. All patients underwent open TMJ surgery after obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), from 2005 to 2015. The presence or absence of disk perforation was confirmed during the operation. Patients were classified into 2 groups: perforation and nonperforation groups. We investigated demographic data and the characteristics of the disk, joint space, and bone on MRI. A logistic regression analysis was performed to analyze risk factors. A nomogram was constructed and validated internally and externally. Results: Risk factors for disk perforation were increased age, disk shape (eyeglass or amorphous), low bone marrow signal, abnormal joint space, and 2 or more bony changes in the condyle and fossa. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the nomogram was 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.869-0.946) in the internal validation and 0.889 (95% CI 0.804-0.973) in the external validation with good suitability. Conclusions: We were able to predict the probability of disk perforation with analyzed risk factors and constructed a nomogram, which may be helpful in proper diagnosis and treatment. © 2018 Elsevier Inc. 
650 0 4 |a adult 
650 0 4 |a Adult 
650 0 4 |a classification 
650 0 4 |a diagnostic imaging 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a nomogram 
650 0 4 |a Nomograms 
650 0 4 |a nuclear magnetic resonance imaging 
650 0 4 |a procedures 
650 0 4 |a Retrospective Studies 
650 0 4 |a retrospective study 
650 0 4 |a risk factor 
650 0 4 |a Risk Factors 
650 0 4 |a temporomandibular joint disc 
650 0 4 |a Temporomandibular Joint Disc 
650 0 4 |a temporomandibular joint disorder 
650 0 4 |a Temporomandibular Joint Disorders 
700 1 |a Huh, J.-K.  |e author 
700 1 |a Jeon, K.-J.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kim, J.-Y.  |e author 
700 1 |a Kim, M.-G.  |e author 
700 1 |a Park, K.-H.  |e author 
773 |t Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology