|
|
|
|
LEADER |
02955nam a2200445Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1016-j.plabm.2021.e00233 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 23525517 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a A Comparison of gel (Hydragel 30) and capillary (Capillarys III Tera) electrophoresis for the characterization of human serum proteins
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Elsevier B.V.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00233
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a Objectives: To compare gel (Hydrasys 2 from Sebia) and capillary (Capillarys III Tera, Sebia) electrophoresis for the characterization of human serum proteins. Design and methods: 304 sera tested by gel electrophoresis during 8 routine laboratory days were concurrently tested by capillary electrophoresis. Gels were read by an experienced medical technologist while capillary profiles by a Sebia representative and the same technologist. Most sera (214 of 304, 70%) were also analyzed by immunofixation electrophoresis, used here as the gold standard to calculate sensitivity and specificity of the gel and capillary systems. Results: Gel and capillary estimated the concentration of albumin, gamma region, and M-spikes nearly perfectly, and that of beta, alpha-2, and alpha-1 regions with excellent correlation. The two systems classified concordantly 268 of 304 sera (88% agreement) as having no, one, or two M-spikes, but differed in the remaining 36 sera (12%). Gel electrophoresis correctly identified M-spikes in 82 of 112 sera that were shown to have monoclonal band(s) by immunofixation (73% sensitivity), and correctly did not reveal M-spikes in 97 of the 102 sera that had no immunofixation bands (95% specificity). Capillary achieved slightly higher sensitivity (85 of 112, 76%) and slightly lower specificity (94 of 102, 92%), but the two areas under the ROC curves were nearly identical at 0.84. Conclusions: Gel and capillary electrophoresis systems perform similarly to estimate the concentration of serum protein fractions and detect M-spikes. © 2021 The Author(s)
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a albumin
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Article
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Capillary
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a capillary electrophoresis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Capillarys III tera
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a concentration (parameter)
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a controlled study
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Electrophoresis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a gel electrophoresis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a gold standard
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a human cell
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Hydrasys II
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a immunoelectrophoresis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a medical technologist
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a monoclonal spike
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a paraprotein
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a protein analysis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a protein electrophoresis
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Sebia
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a sensitivity and specificity
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Serum proteins
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a unclassified drug
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Caturegli, P.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Howard, B.M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Kuh, A.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rezavi, L.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Practical Laboratory Medicine
|