Numerical cognition needs more and better distinctions, not fewer

We agree that the approximate number system (ANS) truly represents number. We endorse the authors' conclusions on the arguments from confounds, congruency, and imprecision, although we disagree with many claims along the way. Here, we discuss some complications with the meanings that undergird...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barth, H. (Author), Shusterman, A. (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 01370nam a2200325Ia 4500
001 10.1017-S0140525X21001163
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 0140525X (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Numerical cognition needs more and better distinctions, not fewer 
260 0 |b Cambridge University Press  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X21001163 
520 3 |a We agree that the approximate number system (ANS) truly represents number. We endorse the authors' conclusions on the arguments from confounds, congruency, and imprecision, although we disagree with many claims along the way. Here, we discuss some complications with the meanings that undergird theories in numerical cognition, and with the language we use to communicate those theories. Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press. 
650 0 4 |a Article 
650 0 4 |a cognition 
650 0 4 |a Cognition 
650 0 4 |a conflict 
650 0 4 |a Dissent and Disputes 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a language 
650 0 4 |a language 
650 0 4 |a Language 
650 0 4 |a nomenclature 
650 0 4 |a number sense 
650 0 4 |a numerical cognition 
650 0 4 |a psychologist 
650 0 4 |a stimulus 
700 1 |a Barth, H.  |e author 
700 1 |a Shusterman, A.  |e author 
773 |t Behavioral and Brain Sciences