Cognitive insensitivity and cognitive impulsivity as mediators of bullying continuity: Extending the psychological inertia construct to bullying behavior

Psychological inertia, the process by which social- cognitive variables help maintain behavioral patterns over time, has been found to explain crime continuity. The present study sought to determine whether psychological inertia can also be used to explain continuity in bullying behavior. A group of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Espelage, D.L (Author), Walters, G.D (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Psychological Association Inc. 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02843nam a2200505Ia 4500
001 10.1037-spq0000240
008 220706s2018 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 10453830 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Cognitive insensitivity and cognitive impulsivity as mediators of bullying continuity: Extending the psychological inertia construct to bullying behavior 
260 0 |b American Psychological Association Inc.  |c 2018 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000240 
520 3 |a Psychological inertia, the process by which social- cognitive variables help maintain behavioral patterns over time, has been found to explain crime continuity. The present study sought to determine whether psychological inertia can also be used to explain continuity in bullying behavior. A group of 1,161 youth (567 male) from the Illinois Study of Bullying and Sexual Violence were surveyed 3 times over a period of 1 year in an effort to determine which of two dimensions of precriminal cognition- cognitive insensitivity (callous, self-serving) or cognitive impulsivity (reckless, emotional)-mediated the past bullying-future bullying relationship. Consistent with research on crime continuity, cognitive impulsivity mediated bullying continuity, but cognitive insensitivity did not. Congruent with research on psychological inertia and crime continuity, the main reason why cognitive insensitivity did not mediate bullying continuity was that prior bullying behavior failed to predict subsequent cognitive insensitivity. In addition to providing support for a 2-dimensional (insensitivity, impulsivity) model of bullying development, these results suggest that 1 way bullying behavior can be managed is by challenging and reducing cognitive impulsivity, which in the current study was found to be a major contributor to bullying continuity. © 2018 American Psychological Association. 
650 0 4 |a adolescent 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent 
650 0 4 |a adolescent behavior 
650 0 4 |a Adolescent Behavior 
650 0 4 |a bullying 
650 0 4 |a Bullying 
650 0 4 |a Bullying perpetration 
650 0 4 |a child 
650 0 4 |a Child 
650 0 4 |a child behavior 
650 0 4 |a Child Behavior 
650 0 4 |a cognition 
650 0 4 |a Cognition 
650 0 4 |a Cognitive impulsivity 
650 0 4 |a Cognitive insensitivity 
650 0 4 |a empathy 
650 0 4 |a Empathy 
650 0 4 |a female 
650 0 4 |a Female 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a Impulsive Behavior 
650 0 4 |a impulsiveness 
650 0 4 |a male 
650 0 4 |a Male 
650 0 4 |a Models, Psychological 
650 0 4 |a physiology 
650 0 4 |a Psychological inertia 
650 0 4 |a psychological model 
650 0 4 |a psychology 
700 1 |a Espelage, D.L.  |e author 
700 1 |a Walters, G.D.  |e author 
773 |t School Psychology Quarterly