Contextual Cuing of Visual Search Does Not Guide Attention Automatically in the Presence of Top-Down Goals

Visual search is faster when it occurs within repeated displays, a phenomenon known as contextual cuing (CC). CC has been explained as the result of an automatic orientation of attention toward a target item driven by learned distractor-target associations. In 3 experiments we tested the specific hy...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beesley, T. (Author), Luque, D. (Author), Molinero, S. (Author), Vadillo, M.A (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Psychological Association 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
LEADER 02456nam a2200397Ia 4500
001 10.1037-xhp0000930
008 220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d
020 |a 00961523 (ISSN) 
245 1 0 |a Contextual Cuing of Visual Search Does Not Guide Attention Automatically in the Presence of Top-Down Goals 
260 0 |b American Psychological Association  |c 2021 
856 |z View Fulltext in Publisher  |u https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000930 
520 3 |a Visual search is faster when it occurs within repeated displays, a phenomenon known as contextual cuing (CC). CC has been explained as the result of an automatic orientation of attention toward a target item driven by learned distractor-target associations. In 3 experiments we tested the specific hypothesis that CC is an automatic process of attentional guidance. Participants first searched for a T target in a standard CC procedure. Then, they experienced the same repeated configurations (with the T still present), but now searched for a Y target that was positioned either in a location on the same, or on a different side, from the old T target. Results suggested that there was no interference caused by the old T-target: target search was not affected by the relative positions of the T and Y. Instead, we found a general facilitation in search times for repeated configurations (Experiments 1 and 2). This main effect disappeared when the need for visual search was eliminated in Experiment 3 using a “feature search task”. These results suggest that repeated sets of distractors did not trigger an uncontrollable response toward the position of the T; instead, CC was produced by perceptual learning processes. © 2021 American Psychological Association 
650 0 4 |a association 
650 0 4 |a attention 
650 0 4 |a Attention 
650 0 4 |a Attention 
650 0 4 |a Automaticity 
650 0 4 |a Contextual cuing 
650 0 4 |a Cues 
650 0 4 |a Goals 
650 0 4 |a human 
650 0 4 |a Humans 
650 0 4 |a learning 
650 0 4 |a Learning 
650 0 4 |a motivation 
650 0 4 |a pattern recognition 
650 0 4 |a Pattern Recognition, Visual 
650 0 4 |a Perceptual learning 
650 0 4 |a reaction time 
650 0 4 |a Reaction Time 
650 0 4 |a Visual search 
700 1 |a Beesley, T.  |e author 
700 1 |a Luque, D.  |e author 
700 1 |a Molinero, S.  |e author 
700 1 |a Vadillo, M.A.  |e author 
773 |t Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance