Default is different: relations and representations in agreement processing

Theories of agreement processing typically focus on the mechanisms by which comprehenders relate the morphological features of the agreement-controlling NP and those of the verb. However, agreement is fundamentally a syntactic relation. In this paper, I examine the processing of default agreement wi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chacón, D.A (Author)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Routledge 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:View Fulltext in Publisher
Description
Summary:Theories of agreement processing typically focus on the mechanisms by which comprehenders relate the morphological features of the agreement-controlling NP and those of the verb. However, agreement is fundamentally a syntactic relation. In this paper, I examine the processing of default agreement with clausal subjects (“[cp That the doctors studied hard] was reassuring”) vs. the processing of agreement with near-synonymous NPs (“[np The fact that the doctors studied hard] was reassuring”). In the NP subject case, there is a syntactic agreement dependency between the head noun fact and the verb was but not in the the CP case. I show that the agreement processing profile for CP subjects differs from those of NP subjects. This suggests that agreement configurations with similar morphology and semantics may be processed using different strategies when embedded in different syntactic structures. © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
ISBN:23273798 (ISSN)
DOI:10.1080/23273798.2021.2022172