|
|
|
|
LEADER |
01955nam a2200325Ia 4500 |
001 |
10.1089-cmb.2021.0342 |
008 |
220427s2021 CNT 000 0 und d |
020 |
|
|
|a 10665277 (ISSN)
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a The Generalized Robinson-Foulds Distance for Phylogenetic Trees
|
260 |
|
0 |
|b Mary Ann Liebert Inc.
|c 2021
|
856 |
|
|
|z View Fulltext in Publisher
|u https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.2021.0342
|
520 |
3 |
|
|a The Robinson-Foulds (RF) distance, one of the most widely used metrics for comparing phylogenetic trees, has the advantage of being intuitive, with a natural interpretation in terms of common splits, and it can be computed in linear time, but it has a very low resolution, and it may become trivial for phylogenetic trees with overlapping taxa, that is, phylogenetic trees that share some but not all of their leaf labels. In this article, we study the properties of the Generalized Robinson-Foulds (GRF) distance, a recently proposed metric for comparing any structures that can be described by multisets of multisets of labels, when applied to rooted phylogenetic trees with overlapping taxa, which are described by sets of clusters, that is, by sets of sets of labels. We show that the GRF distance has a very high resolution, it can also be computed in linear time, and it is not (uniformly) equivalent to the RF distance. © Mercè Llabrés, et al., 2021. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. 2021.
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a algorithm
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Algorithms
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a biological model
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a biology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a classification
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Classification
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Computational Biology
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a metrics
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Models, Genetic
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a phylogenetic tree
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a phylogeny
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Phylogeny
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a procedures
|
650 |
0 |
4 |
|a Robinson-Foulds distance
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Llabrés, M.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Rosselló, F.
|e author
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Valiente, G.
|e author
|
773 |
|
|
|t Journal of Computational Biology
|